Author: Tony Werten
Date: 00:08:42 04/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2001 at 18:15:52, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >In a different discussion, Vincent wrote the following: > >>It is not difficult to implement the form of parallellism as used by >>Rudolf. Invented by a frenchman who couldn't spell a word english and >>who wrote an impossible article for JICCA (did anyone proofread it at >>the time as i'm pretty sure they didn't get his parallel idea?). >> >>At the time when i read the article i was pathetically laughing about it >>actually as i also didn't get the idea of the frenchman. But it appears >>everyone who can make a chessprogram work under win2000 can also get >>within an afternoon his program parallel to work. Then some debugging >>and a day later it works cool. > >I'd be very interested in this algorithm, that can be implemented at an >afternoon :-) > >Could you point elaborate on this. > >BTW. In Paderborn, Roland Pfister also told me, that he knows this from Rudolf >Huber, and he even started to explain it to me. Somhow, we (or me) got >distracted, and I cannot remember the essential things. > >What I remember is, that the time consuming work, of making your >search/evaluation routines free from all those global variables is not needed. > >Regards, >Dieter I haven't tried parallelism yet, but my (very) simple approach would be: Since my program spends most of its time in eval(), split it in evalblack() and evalwhite(). No need for many changes. Haven't got a clue what the speedup would be, but it's easy to try. cheers, Tony
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.