Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:54:43 04/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2001 at 03:08:42, Tony Werten wrote: >On April 16, 2001 at 18:15:52, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>In a different discussion, Vincent wrote the following: >> >>>It is not difficult to implement the form of parallellism as used by >>>Rudolf. Invented by a frenchman who couldn't spell a word english and >>>who wrote an impossible article for JICCA (did anyone proofread it at >>>the time as i'm pretty sure they didn't get his parallel idea?). >>> >>>At the time when i read the article i was pathetically laughing about it >>>actually as i also didn't get the idea of the frenchman. But it appears >>>everyone who can make a chessprogram work under win2000 can also get >>>within an afternoon his program parallel to work. Then some debugging >>>and a day later it works cool. >> >>I'd be very interested in this algorithm, that can be implemented at an >>afternoon :-) >> >>Could you point elaborate on this. >> >>BTW. In Paderborn, Roland Pfister also told me, that he knows this from Rudolf >>Huber, and he even started to explain it to me. Somhow, we (or me) got >>distracted, and I cannot remember the essential things. >> >>What I remember is, that the time consuming work, of making your >>search/evaluation routines free from all those global variables is not needed. >> >>Regards, >>Dieter > >I haven't tried parallelism yet, but my (very) simple approach would be: > >Since my program spends most of its time in eval(), split it in evalblack() and >evalwhite(). No need for many changes. Haven't got a clue what the speedup would >be, but it's easy to try. > >cheers, > >Tony This is not going to work Tony. See my answer to Uri who suggested the same.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.