Author: Paul
Date: 16:06:24 05/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2001 at 19:00:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 03, 2001 at 18:57:26, Paul wrote: > >>On May 03, 2001 at 18:41:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On May 03, 2001 at 18:37:08, John Dahlem wrote: >>> >>>>I had for awhile thought HIARCS 7.32 was considered easily the best, but then I >>>>read a summary from Cadaques 2000 and it seemed to be thought HIARCS was even >>>>somewhat dumb positonally. So, what do you think? HIARCS, Shredder 5, Tiger 14, >>>>Junior 6? >>> >>>According to one test suite: >>>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/fentest.htm >>> >>>These are the top ten: >>>AnMon 5.07 AMD K6-2 450 >>>SOS AMD K6-2 450 >>>Rebel 10b AMD K6-2 450 >>>Nimzo 3 P90 >>>Rebel Gambit II AMD K6-2 450 >>>Rebel Tiger 14 AMD K6-2 450 >>>Nimzo 3.5 P90 >>>Hiarcs 7.32 AMD K6-2 450 >>>Shredder 4 AMD K6-2 450 >>>Phalanx XXII AMD K6-2 450 >> >>Quite a coincidence ... I just mentioned this test in the CCR test thread. >> >>Somehow I think that that test is not very meaningful; I posted the results of >>my Pretz March last year (when it had very little positional knowledge) at 1 >>minute per position (iso the required 15'/p): >> >>Score: 129 (5 10 10 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 0 5 10 7) >> >>"Champion" Paul > >Maybe your program really is the best positional program on earth. Ha! >How does it do in the quiet moves in general? That quite a general question .. hard to answer. But I will say that it's no highflyer positionally (darn ... it just bit me again), I like to tweak my search for tactics & mates, not the eval ... :( >How does it do on LCT II? Dunno ... never tested that one, looks too difficult for now! :) Paul
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.