Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: One mate to solve...

Author: leonid

Date: 05:47:07 05/14/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 13, 2001 at 21:07:46, Heiner Marxen wrote:

>On May 13, 2001 at 11:42:22, leonid wrote:
>
>>Hello!
>>
>>If you want to solve one easy mate then this is the right one:
>>
>>[D]1BqQ4/nB6/1p2NQ2/kbbrNRRK/1p2NQ2/nB6/1BqQ4/8 w - -
>>
>>Please indicate your result.
>>
>>This night I wanted to solve few positions on Mate 2 but could not find how to
>>say exact number of moves to search and could not see the time. If you will
>>solve this position on Mate 2.0 (like me from Hiarcs package), or from some
>>other version of Mate, please say your time. If you happened to solve recently
>>on Mate some other mate positions, please put here, at least, one of them. Ideal
>>will be mate between 6 and 9 moves. Don't forget to mention hash of program and
>>speed of your computer.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Leonid.
>
>Chest on a K7/600 with 350 MB hash (100 MB would have been enough this time)
>needs 589 seconds (10 minutes) to come up with 2 ley moves for "mate in 7".
>Since both are not checks, I give some more variants, not just the PVs:


Here we coincide almost like brothers. Even our branching factor look very close
but your is better. Somewhere we have more that similar structures inside of our
programs, I am almost sure about this. If you would like, you could see this on
yourself. CPU - Celeron 600Mhz.

4 moves - 0.66 sec
          branching factor 9.4
5 moves - 6.2 sec
          branching factor 15
6 moves - 1 min 32 sec

7 moves 21 min 41 sec. Mate found.



>N4xc5 Be8+  Kh6    Qxd2  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nc4+   Nxc4 Bc7+   Qxc7  Qxc7+  Kb5 Ba6#
>      Be2+  Kh6    Bc4   Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nc7+   Ka5  Qa6+   Bxa6  Qfxb4#
>      Nc4   Nxc4+  Bxc4  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nc7+   Ka5  Qa6+   Bxa6  Qfxb4#
>      Q8xc5 Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nxc5+  Bc6   Ned7+  Rxd7 Qfxb4+ N3b5  Qa5#
>      Qc3   Nc4+   Bxc4  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Bc7+   Qxc7 Qxc7+  Kb5   Ba6#
>      Qd1+  Bxd1   Be2+  Qxe2   N7b5  Qxb5+  Kxb5 Nd4+   =*=   Qfxb6#
>      Qxd2  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nc4+   Bxc4  Bc7+   Qxc7 Qxc7+  Kb5   Ba6#
>      Rd4   Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nc4+   Bxc4  Nd8+   Ka5  Na4+   Q2xf5 Qb6#
>      Rxd2  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nc4+   Bxc4  Nd8+   Ka5  Na4+   Q2xf5 Qb6#
>      Bc4   Qxb6+  Kxb6  Nc7+   Ka5   Qa6+   Bxa6 Qfxb4#
>      Q2xc5 Nxc5   Be2+  Qxe2   Nc4   Nxc4+  Kb5  Qfxb6#
>      Qc4   Nxc4+  Bxc4  Qxb4+  Kxb4  Bc3+   Kb5  Ba4#
>      Qe4   Nc4+   Bxc4  Qxb4+  Kxb4  Bc3+   Kb5  Ba4#
>      Nc6   Nxc6+  =*=   Qfxb4#
>      Qxb3  Nxb3+  Ka4   Qfxb4#
>      -*-   Qfxb4#
>
>N6xc5 Be2+  Ng4    Bxg4+ Kh6    Nc4   Qf1    Nb5  Qa1+   Nba3  Qxa3+ Kb5 Qaxb4#
>      Be8+  Ng6    Bxg6+ Kh6    Nc4   Qf1    Nb5  Qa1+   Nba3  Qxa3+ Kb5 Qaxb4#
>      Nc6   Nxc6+  Bxc6  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Qxb4+  Nb5  Ba7+   Kxa7  Qa5#
>      Q8xc5 Nxc5   Qd1+  Qxd1   Bc6   Nxc6+  Nxc6 Na4    Kb5   Rxd5#
>      Qc7   Nc6+   Bxc6  Qxb4+  Kxb4  Bc3+   Qxc3 Qxc3+  Kb5   Ba6#
>      Qd1+  Bxd1   Be8+  Kh6    Bc6   Nb3+   Kb5  Nd6+   =*=   Qfxb4#
>      Qxd8  Qxb4+  Kxb4  Nc6+   Bxc6  Bc3+   Qxc3 Qxc3+  Kb5   Ba6#
>      Rd6   Qxb4+  Kxb4  Nc6+   Bxc6  Nd2+   Ka5  Na6+   Q2xf5 Qb4#
>      Rxd8  Qxb4+  Kxb4  Nc6+   Bxc6  Nd2+   Ka5  Qb4+   Kxb4  Na6#
>      Bc6   Qxb4+  Kxb4  Nc3+   Ka5   Qa4+   Bxa4 Qfxb6#
>      Q2xc5 Nxc5   Be2+  Qxe2   Nc4   Nxc4+  Kb5  Qfxb6#
>      Qc6   Nxc6+  Bxc6  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Bc7+   Kb5  Ba6#
>      Qe6   Nc6+   Bxc6  Qxb6+  Kxb6  Bc7+   Kb5  Ba6#
>      Nc4   Nxc4+  =*=   Qfxb6#
>      Qxb7  Nxb7+  Ka6   Qfxb6#
>      -*-   Qfxb6#
>
>They are completely symetric (line 1 has no symetric counterpart).
>
>The effective branching factor of Chest is well above 10:
>
>depth  seconds
>#  1      0.00  0.87          1-         0
>#  2      0.00  1.00          1-         0
>#  3      0.03  0.97         88-         0
>#  4      0.28  1.06       1103-         0
>#  5      2.98  1.17      11673-         0
>#  6     34.17  1.29     139710-         0
>#  7    588.01  1.38    2086866-        69
>
>Also, the hash table did not contribute very much (factor 1.38).
>
>Cheers,
>Heiner

Hi, Heiner!

This time one personal demand. Can you send me your mate solver? I tried two
times to do this by going into your site but something I did in a wrong way.

I use Windows ME. If you have somewhere executive file, it will be the best. If
whatever you will need to find in my program, you will just ask and my response
will be instant.

Now I am in changing few thing in my mate solver and for this I need some
excellent mate solver as reference. It is not that simple to find as somebody
could imagine. Before I had the impression that Genius 2 could do the work but
later found that its moves number is fixed by 99 limit. The same is true for
other best chess programs and even, to my susprise, for mate solver Mate 2.0.
Mate 2.0 (he is in the package with Hiarcs program) do not permit to indicate
directly number of moves that you would like for him to see. Its number of moves
is once again limited to 99. He do not indicate the time when he think.
It could be that I don't know how to use it. Hiarcs is not very talkative as
programe in general. The best in its openess, between all program that I ever
used, is Rebel. If I will one day end my chess program then I will try to make
everything in my program as clear and accessible as this program did.

Cheers,
Leonid.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.