Author: Bo Persson
Date: 08:25:58 06/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2001 at 07:13:00, Chris Carson wrote: >On June 06, 2001 at 04:22:34, Tanya Deborah wrote: > >> >>Hi to all! >> >>I have 2 questions. >> >>The match against GM Robert Huebner will be very interesting! and i think that >>it will be like a preparation for the match against World Champion Kramnik. >> >> >>But what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz for the match against Huebner?? >>and how many time will be the games?? >> >> >>Also, Somebody know what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz to play against >>Kramnik??? >> >> I can´t see any information about the -kind of machines they will use (Mhz, >>Ram? etc)in the Chessbase page. >> >>Too, i believe that Deep Fritz is a bit better, (running in 8 procesor machine) >>than Deep Blue 97 version...(the same that won against Kasparov) Is this >>right? >> >>I need that Chessbase will need a lot of hard work! if they want to repeat like >>IBM did against Kasparov in 1997. Anyway i think that it is very very difficult >>that it happen again. It will be a Dream! >> >> >>Thanks... >> >>Best Regards! >> >> >>Tanya >> Deborah. > >Tanya, > >Not sure I can add anything more than the other posts. I can only speak >about results and Deep Fritz has not given a performance greater than >DB97 yet. My opinion is that Deep Junior on a 8xPIII 1GHZ would be very >close to DB97 performance, this may also be true for Deep Fritz, Deep Shredder, >Chess Tiger (smp or single), Rebel Century (smp or single), Hiarcs, and perhaps >others. > >If the same match conditions for DB97 could be set up, then my opinion is that >an equivelant 8xPIII 2GHZ could produce superior results than DB97. However, >the PIV does not appear to provide equal GHZ to GHZ performance with the PIII >and I doubt that the PIII will ever get to 2GHZ. > >The Deep Fritz match is much tougher "match conditions", so it will be >interesting. :) > >Finally, we will never know. DB97 no longer plays so all comparison is >speculation and any future DB chip by HSU will be superior to DB97, in my >opinion. :) Why do you think Hsu/IBM would use the DB97? What if they set up a DB-2001?? The then "massively parallell" 32-node IBM RS/6000 SP is now available in "standard" configuration 64, 80 and 128 node versions: http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/resource/aix_resource/sp_books/hardware/planguide1/da709mst16.html#HDRTWOSW Note also: "...more than 128 nodes are available. Consult your IBM representative...". :-) >Best Regards, >Chris Carson Bo Persson bop@malmo.mail.telia.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.