Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 03:44:24 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
> >>You have to keep positions closed. That's not easy. > >correct, some people think that doing this is a walk in the park. > >But you can practise how to >>play against computers. But that needs time. And the IM's and GM'S don't do this > >How do you know this? This is just a guess. > No, that's not. If you pracise you'll improve your chess. That's logical. If you practise anti-computer-chess, you'll improve it. I did improve my anti-computer-chess, not enough for beating the top programs. But if you compare my results against computers in FICS with my usual rating, my results against computers are now better than my other results. Because of knowing a little bit better now how to play. >>because they earn money for playing humans. So of course they're not that >>experienced in playing computers than in playing humans. > >We don't know how much experiece the players have, do you know for sure?? > For sure. You need time for practising. WHY THE HELL SHOULD AN IM USE THIS TIME FOR PRACTISING AGAINST COMPUTER? When this doesn't help against humans? It's like practising marathon when you want to run 100m. > >>If they practised like Eduard does they would win much more. But they don't. Of >>course they don't. > >You are saying this as fact, you may be right or just wrong. > >> >>>BTW: Players with 1900 ratings and lower have beaten and drawn GMs and IMs >>>before. >>> >>>>> >>>>>BTW Where is the analysis to back up your aguments about how poor the IM played! >>>> >>>>Black has in this kind of positions 3 main goals: playing b5, d5 and f5. Agree? >>>>Without problems he could play b5 and f5. White didn't achieve anything. So IMO >>>>there must be something wrong. Nf3 doesn't fit in this position, it belongs to >>>>e2.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.