Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WMCC

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 08:27:32 07/11/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 11, 2001 at 04:09:24, Tony Werten wrote:

>On July 10, 2001 at 11:52:38, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On July 10, 2001 at 02:46:24, Tony Werten wrote:
>>
>>>>What if I had bought a computer for this last week?  Suddenly I get there and
>>>>I'm not competitive because I assumed, with a month left, that it was a
>>>>single-processor event.
>>>
>>>I have to disagree. Last year multiprocessors machines were not banished from
>>>the event. The just had to show they were only using one processor.( Diep and
>>>Junior if I remember correctly )
>>>
>>>If your program benefits from multiprocessor and you want to play at tournaments
>>>and you then buy a single processor, then your choice was wrong.
>>
>>I don't understand this.  In my house I have a 550 mhz P3.  I have a Quad 450
>>Xeon.  The first is not competitive, the second is too big to consider taking on
>>an airplane again.
>
>Do you really think this quad is much better than a 1.3 Ghz AMD ?

What is Chessbase bringing?  Do you think they are bringing 1.3 ghz AMD's?

>>The event has been a single-processor event.
>
>Where did you read this ? It has been a pc event. 10 years ago 100 Mhz was a
>fast pc, nowadays multiprocessors are normal in pc's. Should they go back to
>286- 16Mhz because that was normal a while ago ?

The even has always been a single-processor event.  Multiple processors have
been specifically excluded.  To include them on short notice is a big change.

>Last year it was single processor. Correct. Last year it was below 1Ghz as well.
>And last but not least it was in Londen. Don't expect to be able to play however
>if you show up with your computer in London. Things change.

All I am getting at here is that some *notice* helps.

>>If I had ordered a computer last
>>week, a single-processor machine, because this is a single-processor event,
>>I would have potentially spent a lot of money on an uncompetitive machine.
>
>That's the risk you run if a you buy something on what you believe others are
>going to ask. Again, who of the organising commite told you it was going to be
>single processor ?

WMCCC = single-processor.  Every previous event, even though duals and quads
have been available for some time.  There have always been restrictions on
machines in this event.

>>>Second, for most people the difference between a single and a multiprocessor
>>>does not make the difference between being competitive or not. It's the same
>>>discussion every year before such an event. Program A is going to win because
>>>the processor is 50% faster than program B. It's just not true, as is shown
>>>every year after the event. Of course, faster (or more) processors help. But not
>>>that much.
>>
>>This is bull.  You ask what Chessbase is going to bring.  You ask what everyone
>>is going to bring.  All the commercials will be on the hottest stuff they can
>>find, and it does matter a whole lot.
>>
>>People spend months trying to scrape 10% performance out of their engine,
>
>How much ELO is 10% ? Maybe almost 5 ?
>
>>and
>>yet a speed factor of 2 or 3 doesn't matter?  No.
>
>Reread. It did not say it didn't matter. I said it didn't matter that much.

If you think that, you are wrong.

>Of course the professionals show up with more heavy material than most amateurs.
>They have always done that, and they always will. That's a big part of the
>difference between amateurs and professionals, the amount of money they can
>spend.
>
>They don't care where the events is held, they can afford the airtickets. Of
>course it would be nice to have all the tickets paid. But it's not the 90's
>anymore. Computerchess is not that popular anymore, so they didn't find a
>sponsor willing to pay that much money. Maybe next year, maybe never again.

This is not worth arguing about anymore.  The event is going to be a godawful
fiasco.

bruce

>Tony
>
>>
>>People want to take this event seriously, and it's seriously screwed that the
>>organizers don't.
>>
>>bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.