Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Tiger doesn't understand-Try tiger12.0 it understands very well!!!

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:29:12 08/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 28, 2001 at 12:04:00, Roy Eassa wrote:

>On August 28, 2001 at 09:26:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On August 27, 2001 at 16:50:36, robert flesher wrote:
>>
>>>Tiger 12.0 running on a mere pentium 850mhz with 256 mega of ram Sees that if
>>>white exchanges both rooks followed by moving the king and playing b4 and a4
>>>wins. Anyone who still has tiger 12.0 should be able to confirm this. I have
>>>gambit2.0 and tiger 14.0, but as ive posted before i prefer tiger12.0.
>>
>>
>>What I am trying to ask is this:
>>
>>1.  from the original position, does CT understand that trading all the
>>rooks is bad?  IE a 5-6 ply search should let it see the rooks coming off.
>>And after that PV/score is displayed, does it show white is winning?
>>
>>2.  After playing the moves that trade the rooks off, there are no pieces
>>left.  It is pretty easy to search to 20 plies here, and that is more than
>>enough to see that white queenside majority turning into a white outside
>>passed pawn.  Does it realize the outside passer is winning?
>>
>>If it doesn't realize white is winning after searching just deeply enough to
>>see the pieces coming off, then it is going to have trouble in these kinds of
>>endings, which are pretty common.  If it does realize white is winning in case
>>2, that means it probably understands the outside passer, or at least it knows
>>that one side having a passer is probably winning.
>>
>>The more interesting question is "does it understand that the white majority is
>>_also_ winning if there are no pieces left, because the majority will turn into
>>a distant passer later in the game"???
>
>
>My brief experiments show that the answer is "No" to 1 and "Yes" to 2 for both
>current Tigers and for Fritz 6 & Junior 6.


OK... so they don't understand pawn majorities but they do understand either
passed pawns or outside passed pawns.  That matches with what I have seen on
ICC...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.