Author: Mark Young
Date: 14:40:17 09/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2001 at 17:29:54, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On September 18, 2001 at 17:02:51, Mark Young wrote: > >>On September 18, 2001 at 16:54:23, Steven Schwartz wrote: >> >>>Mark, >>>The moderators create their own rules and regulations >>>on these issues. Quite often they ask the outgoing >>>moderators for information as it pertains to how they >>>ran the show. >>> >>>Therefore, it is important that all members read the >>>moderation philosophies and ask pertinent questions so >>>that you can elect moderators that agree with your own >>>philosophies. >> >>That is why I am asking this question after reading the moderation policies, I >>needed to know if I should vote for a range of views to have a broad consensus, >>or must I voted for only people I most agree with, or have my votes overriden by >>one moderator that does not share the views of the other elected moderators. > >If the members elect moderators who are in opposition to each other, you will >make things tough on them. > >One of the problems with our process is that the moderators who are elected >might have contradictory attitudes about some very basic things. There is no >"oficial" process in place to help them get past this if it happens -- they are >on their own. The problem I have is I would like to vote for people I know, but I don't agree with 100%. Or must I vote for people I don't know but agree with more in their written policy and hope they follow their moderation policy. From what Bob has told me, there is a unwritten policy to keep a loose cannon from taking over the moderation board. That takes care of my concerns. > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.