Author: Mike S.
Date: 21:35:49 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2001 at 00:03:18, K. Burcham wrote: >(...) >i have a different feel for my games because i move manually. >i am able to watch eval against humans and other programs. > >i have noticed that against humans my eval is not steady at all, it fluctuates. >against programs my eval is usually steady, either close to 0, or slowly drops. >(...) >Tell Bullet_To_Brain when we played you kept my >eval at 0, humans dont do that against my >program So you say, if the eval of your program doesn't "fluctuate", and/or is kept at 0, it must be a computer?! That's no good evidence IMO. Actually I think there is very few which can be considered good evidence. A series of best tablebase moves, maybe - if they are really difficult also. But none of that which is mentioned usually, like using time on "obvious" moves (master gave advice that a player *should* think twice expecially over obvious moves, for example). I'm aware that those comp cheating is annoying and a problem, but I'm afraid the bigger problem is, that honest strong and precisely playing people are accused (thank god I don't have that problem, being way below master ratings... :o) Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.