Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:11:26 11/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2001 at 05:27:15, Tanya Deborah wrote: >On November 25, 2001 at 03:55:38, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 25, 2001 at 03:20:25, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >> >>> > > >Buena partida Antonio!! Aún no conosco muy bien la fuerza del Averno, ya que no >he jugado mucho contra él, pero me gustaría poder jugar un par de partidas >contra él. Me podrías decir cual es la última version y donde conseguirlo???? > >Gracias!! > > > >By the way 23. f6! was cool. >> >>23...gxf6 is a tactical mistake that is losing the queen for a rook. >> >>Chess programs are weak in tactic when they play blitz. >>I suspect that averno is not going to let you to win it in this way at 120/40 > > >Hi Uri! Why do you say that Chess programs are weak in tactics when they played >blitz??? > >Chess programs can win to 99% of all humans today in rapid games because the >programs can see deep tactics in rapid games, more than a human can see, they >(programs) are not weak in tactics, we (humans) are very weak in tactics. > >Tanya. I admit that humans are usually weaker in tactics. Inspite of this fact there are some mistakes that programs do only in blitz and part of the humans can take advantage of these mistakes. I suspect that for part of the humans preparing against a program for a blitz match may be more easier than preparing against it for a tournament time control match. The trojan horse sacrifice is an example for anti computer tactics that work against part of the programs without anti-trojan code mainly in blitz(it can work also at tournament time control but these cases are more rare). In this case the tactics that was used by f6 was also tactics that can work only at blitz because at tournament time control only very weak programs are going to play gxf6. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.