Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is C# best ideal for any chess programming?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 14:27:41 11/27/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 27, 2001 at 17:02:59, Gareth McCaughan wrote:

>On November 27, 2001 at 13:15:19, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>> Garbage collection is unfathomably lame, and one of the chief faults of BASIC
>> and Java.  It is a key reason why it can not be reliably used for real time
>> systems.
>
>The best garbage collectors of today are a *lot* better
>than they used to be. (They are mostly not found in Java
>VMs, though.) I'm not convinced automatic memory management
>is a great idea for writing a chess program, but for lots
>of purposes it seems to me to be a real win. On what grounds
>do you say it's unfathomably lame?

It's not unfathomably lame for everything.  It's unfathomably lame for real-time
systems, chess programs, and performance critical applications.

Actually, I'm not a VB hater or a Java hater.  Those would be my language of
choice for a quick front end application.  But (for instance) if you were to
write a web server in Java, I think you are probably ready for the looney bin.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.