Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 08:41:15 12/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2001 at 10:32:20, Thorsten Czub wrote: >any human beeing has prejudices. only you don't tell them in public. >nobody can live and judge anything without having prejudices. only >god has no prejudices. Well, there you go. QED. >the fact that you talk about games you haven't seen. No, I haven't mentioned a single game. It's the lack of games that makes your opinions less than credible. >when my methods are wrong, why was i succesful in finding out that hiarcs would >be world chess champion BEFORE the championship was played out. >when it is wrong, why was i able to see that chess tiger is very very strong, >without even the programmer (christophe) knowing and believing it. >when my method is wrong, how can i see in forward that century is very strong, >and century makes 2nd rank, and how can i find out about cstal ? >and about nimzo? You've just mentioned five programs, which constitutes a significant percentage of commercial programs available. And the predictions aren't that good. If I were to select five programs that turned out to be strong and call it intuition, I would be a fool because it isn't really an accomplishment. >all i see is that you claim that you do not replay games, hear about strength >from hearsaid, and call other methods lousy. when in fact you don't know about >the programs. Correct, I know virtually nothing about Zarkov. But that's irrelevant. You made a flawed assessment on nothing. That's the point. >instead of finding out yourself by researching, you call other people idiots and >their methods wrong. When? I haven't called anyone an idiot recently and there is no method in your case, which is the problem. >of course it is nonsense to test version x versus version x+1. this does not >lead you to a better chessprogram. That's only partially correct. >instead of showing your incompetence in evaluating chess programs you should >better do something senseful. I'm probably incompetent in evaluating chess programs, but that's not the topic. Your little crystal ball is. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.