Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Gambit Tiger 2.0 vs IM Berg 2500 - Game 4

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 00:21:58 12/23/01



 [D]2bq1rk1/1p2ppbp/r1np2p1/1N6/N1P1n3/1B2B3/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 b - - 0 13

 This is a position from the fourth game between Gambit Tiger and IM Berg 2500.
 Here GT presented a theoretical novelty which, as far as I know, never before
 has been tried. GT played 13.-Be6!?, inviting to an exchange sacrifice. Emanuel
 called with 14.Bb6, but black had enough compensation with a pawn for the
 exchange, the bishop pair and good control over the black squares. After some
 complications the game levelled out to a draw. The whole game further down.

 PIII 800, 192 Mb hash, 2 hours per player for the whole game. Tigerbook used.

 A short summary of the 4 games played so far:

 In these games Gambit Tiger has not been able to put any serious pressure
 on IM Berg. GT has in fact been very far from winning any of the games.
 All games have been open with lots of piece play and tactics.

 Game 1: IM Berg had a winning endgame but slipped slightly and let Tiger
         escape with a draw.

 Game 2: GT misplayed the ending with opposite colored bishops a bit and lost.
         Emanuel showed great creativity in sacking 3 pawns and taking his
         chances.

 Game 3: Emanuel attacked but GT countered good with 23.b5!. E had to
         go for the brakes and a solid draw.

 Game 4: The game below. GT correctly sacked an exchanged in the opening,
         got good compensation - and after some tactics the game ended
         in a draw.


 Result: Gambit Tiger 2.0 - IM Emanuel Berg 2500  1.5 - 2.5


 After Christmas Emanuel will play in Hastings and then Bermudas.
 We plan to resume these games ( maybe vs some new program) when he returns.


[Event "Emanuel 120'"]
[Site "KIL"]
[Date "2001.12.17"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Berg, Emanuel"]
[Black "Gambit Tiger 2.0"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B35"]
[WhiteElo "2500"]
[PlyCount "89"]
[EventDate "2001.12.11"]

{192MB, PowerBig.ctg. PIII 800
} 1. e4 {. . Alterman,B 0} 1... c5 {-0.01/1 0}
2. Nf3 {6} 2... Nc6 {-0.01/1 0} 3. d4 {11} 3... cxd4 {-0.01/1 0} 4. Nxd4 {13}
4... g6 {-0.01/1 0} 5. Nc3 {55} 5... Bg7 {-0.01/1 0} 6. Be3 {10} 6... Nf6 {
-0.01/1 0} 7. Bc4 {56} 7... O-O {-0.01/1 0} 8. Bb3 {42} 8... a5 {-0.01/1 0} 9.
O-O {(This is what we around here call "the Nataf variation. Previously people
played 9.a4 to prevent black from doing the same. GM Nataf has shown that
white can get pressure and active piece play though.) 30} 9... a4 {-0.01/1 0}
10. Nxa4 {16} 10... Nxe4 {-0.01/1 0} 11. Nb5 {26} 11... Ra6 {0.60/13 118} 12.
c4 {207} 12... d6 {0.04/13 99} 13. Qe2 {163} 13... Be6 $146 {(This is a
theoretical
novelty by Tiger. Previously has been played 13.-Nf6. 13.-f5 is not so
good because white can still play 14.Bb6 (c5+ is waiting...). With the move 13.
-Be6, Tiger invites to an exchange sacrifice.) 0.14/14 197} 14. Bb6 {(Knowing t
hat black gets a pawn for the exchange + the bishop pair and good control over
the black squares. Still Emanuel wanted to "call" the position and see what
would happen. 14.Rad1 or even 14.Rfd1 would have kept the pressure.) 458} 14...
Rxb6 {-0.30/13 21} 15. Nxb6 {20} 15... Qxb6 {-0.48/16 101} 16. Qxe4 {12} 16...
Bxb2 {-0.42/15 200} 17. Rad1 {44} 17... Be5 {-0.44/14 272} 18. Kh1 {(White has
nothing on the queenside, so the chances are on the opposite wing. He also has
to keep an eye on the c-pawn.) 428} 18... Rd8 {-0.42/12 161} 19. h3 {504} 19...
Qc5 {-0.60/13 118} 20. f4 {362} 20... Bf6 {-0.80/14 111} 21. Nc7 {(If white is
to push the pawns on the kingside, he must find a way to get rid of black's
white squared bishop.) 497} 21... Bf5 {-0.36/17 352} 22. Qe1 {75} 22... e6 {
-0.38/14 118} 23. g4 {229} 23... Nd4 {-0.80/15 173} 24. gxf5 {136} 24... Qxc7 {
-0.76/14 37} 25. fxe6 {239} 25... Qc6+ {-0.76/14 111} 26. Kh2 {139} 26... Nf3+
{-0.78/15 206} 27. Rxf3 {320} 27... Qxf3 {-0.80/14 0} 28. exf7+ {28} 28... Kxf7
{-0.80/12 24} 29. Qg3 {(With equal play.) 206} 29... Qe2+ {-0.46/13 100} 30.
Qg2 {54} 30... Qe3 {-0.40/13 190} 31. Qxb7+ {393} 31... Kg8 {-0.46/15 785} 32.
Qd5+ {149} 32... Kh8 {-0.44/16 0} 33. Qd2 {94} 33... Qf3 {-0.50/15 10} 34. Re1
{661} 34... g5 {-0.42/17 0} 35. Qe3 {239} 35... Qxe3 {-0.32/17 662} 36. Rxe3 {
12} 36... gxf4 {0.52/16 98} 37. Re6 {31} 37... Be5 {0.16/16 98} 38. Ba4 {326}
38... f3+ {-0.15/14 79} 39. Kg1 {20} 39... Bd4+ {0.05/15 60} 40. Kf1 {37} 40...
f2 {0.04/15 38} 41. Re8+ {35} 41... Rxe8 {-0.09/19 36} 42. Bxe8 {9} 42... Kg7 {
-0.10/19 142} 43. a4 {3} 43... Bb6 {-0.14/18 188} 44. a5 {4} 44... Bxa5 {
-0.18/17 73} 45. Kxf2 {2} 1/2-1/2


 Sune




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.