Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:05:02 01/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2002 at 15:05:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 13:33:16, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On December 31, 2001 at 05:29:55, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On December 30, 2001 at 21:22:31, Will Bundy wrote: >>> >>>>I know CM8000 is very , very strong yet it is not near the top programs, it >>>>still seems absurd to view it as weakest. >>> >>>I'd say Nimzo 8. >> >>Fritz if you remove its book it's like 2000 at most. > >If you do not assume special preperation of the 2000 player that is based on >having the exact version of Fritz then you are wrong. But this is what i mean. Fritz is that bad that if you remove its book that a random 2000 player will beat it. In fact why do i know this? Jos Nooijen, look him up in the rating list. Said fritz was unbeatable. Said this for years. Then he needed to install some major other software. He removed the huge openingsbook from harddisk to save up space. Now he finds fritz real bad! he beats it!! >If you give 2400 player to play against 2000 player and force the 2400 player to >start with 1.a3 2.h3 then I expect the 2400 player to win in most of the cases. > >If you give 2400 player to play against Fritz and tell the 2400 player to start >1.a3, 2.h3 then I expect the 2400 player to lose in most of the cases unless he >did special prepration based on memorizing of a game that was tried at home >against the exact version. > >Changing the evaluation between the games(for example deciding that the value of >pawn is 1.1 instead of 1) may be enough to change the moves of Fritz and prevent >the problem of memorizing games. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.