Author: Bo Persson
Date: 10:21:14 01/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2002 at 15:12:30, Severi Salminen wrote: >>I do something like this (Dann Corbit's trick): >> >> bsf eax dword ptr bitboard+4 >> add eax 32 >> bsf eax dword ptr bitboard >> > >I'm doing allmost the same, but is it _certain_ that the 2nd bsf _never_ alters >eax if nothing is found? Why don't they write "unaffected" but "undefined"???Can >someone confirm this? > >Severi This is like over-clocking the specification. It *seems* to work, even though Intel says it should not. As usual this probably means that it works fine, except during any WCCC event. Bo Persson bop2@telia.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.