Author: Gregor Overney
Date: 19:05:13 01/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2002 at 15:17:54, Dan Andersson wrote: >You have to read the numbers right. Intels earnigs come from selling assets, >that's really bad practice. It means that they are bleeding. AMD's loss comes >from investments in itself. i.e. buying and constructing assets. That means they >have been gaining higher net worth. But it is always risky binding capital. > >MvH Dan Andersson Assuming that the moderators do not delete this non-CCC related thread about stock performance of highly volatile companies, I must add my reply to your interesting and unique viewpoint. "You have to read the numbers right." - Do you mean, I have to ignore all facts and just read them your way? The earnings growth of AMD and INTC in the past year have decelerated rapidly compared to earnings growth in the past three years. Anyway, StockScouter market analysis is pretty much pro INTC. Here's a summary as of JAN-2002: Advanced Micro Devices = above average risk (rating 5) Intel Corporation = average risk (rating 8) Gregor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.