Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 11:18:26 02/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2002 at 13:14:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 19, 2002 at 20:19:59, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>On February 18, 2002 at 18:40:18, Frank Nelson wrote: >> >>>I tried fireside.anti-computer strategy and got buried by Hiarcs 7.32! >>>I used f4-e3-d4-c3 formation only to watch Hiarcs open it up like a knife >>>to a watermelon. I had a book once which said that studying the games of >>>David Bronstein vs. computers was the right direction for anti-computers. >>>I think that a person has to use his own common sense when playing against a >>>computer. Computers don't get tired unless they are running on batteries >>>and is usually good at forcing a desirable tactical variation. I think that most >>>people play well when the opening is over then start to tire move-by-move and >>>then blunder in a level position. The computer of course then take the >>>initiative until it leads to a + - ! If anyone have some original anti-computer >>>strategy please post to this CCC newsgroup. Thanks in advance. >>> >>>Ljubomir Nelson >>Given the strength of current programs there is no such thing anymore.Rebel is >>eating VanWely alive .Maybe this was true 10 years.If you are not a GM you >>dont have a chance against a program > >Loek is eating rebel alive. he wanted to win first game a bit too soon >and did a very dubious king walk. > >then he lost because he wanted to win. Rebel nowhere had real chances >in both games till Loek blundered in game 1 somewhere near the end of >the game. Yes but if Human GM's did not make any mistakes ;they would be playing perfect chess (which we know they do not.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.