Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: (Somewhat OT?) Exercise for remembering positions

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 03:13:21 02/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 25, 2002 at 04:50:14, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote:

>On February 25, 2002 at 04:26:45, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>
>>On February 25, 2002 at 02:39:44, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote:
>>
>>>On February 22, 2002 at 16:10:44, John Merlino wrote:
>>>
>>>>The next version of Chessmaster is going to have an exercise in which you are
>>>>required to remember a position and then set it up on an empty board. Your
>>>>thoughts on designing this exercise would be appreciated. Here's what we have
>>>>now:
>>>>
>>>>Beginner -- 4-8 pieces (men), always a legal position
>>>>Intermediate -- 8-16 pieces (men), always a legal position
>>>>Advanced -- 12-20 pieces, completely random (and possibly illegal) position
>>>
>>>I don't think this should be random positions.
>>>These more random and less chess the position is, tyhe differences between the
>>>advanced and the beginner will be smaller.
>>>
>>>I think you should get this position from real games to ensure that the position
>>>is logical so that chess-memory is tested/trained.
>>>
>>>Odd Gunnar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>And who wants to memorize illegal positions ?
>>
>
>I read somewhere about a test with players on this theme. I don't remembere
>where (Tisdall?).

It was a test done by De Groot to get an idea how the brain of a chessplayer
works. ie The difference between an amateur and a grandmaster.

With a random position (a dice was used) the difference was very small. I
remember seeing Euwe trying to recreate a random position, throwing all pieces
on the board, saying "this is nonsense" and refusing to continue.

(Must have been a follow up on the original experiment since that was done in
1946 I think)

Tony

>The result was that with illogical position even GM's had a hard time to get
>good score. But soon the positions where logical the difference between
>beginners and GM was much bigger. The GM's was getting high score but the
>beginner stayed with the same low score.
>
>So my point was an answer to John Merlino's new function in Chessmaster that its
>better let the positions be logical to get a more accurate test/exercise.
>
>Odd Gunnar



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.