Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:14:53 03/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 13, 2002 at 09:49:49, stuart taylor wrote: >On March 13, 2002 at 07:26:08, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On March 13, 2002 at 04:09:54, Jerry Doby wrote: >> >>>It's hard to believe that anything can be that much strongeer then fritz7 on a >>>fast platform. Is deepblue 100 elo or above deepfritz on an xp 2000 >> >>OK, I will bite and get a debate going most likely. First take a look at: >>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/manmachine.htm >> >>Tony's page has the results for both Top programs today and Deep Blue. >> >>Here is a brief comparison: >> >>Deep Blue 97 2862 6 games >>Chess Tiger 2788 11 games >>Deep Junior 2702 9 games >>Rebel Cen 2697 4 games >>Deep Fritz 2678 12 games >> >>None of the Commercial programs are on fastest HW today. Deep Blue only played >>6 games against one opponent that did not get to prepare (Rebel opponent played >>100 games against Rebel before the match). My guess is that Deep Blue rating >>would drop by 100 to 200 points if put to a serious test. The Commercial >>programs would be 100 points stronger on fastest HW. So they are about the same >>or slight favorite to the commercials. I think Rebel, Tiger on fastest single >>processors and Deep F/J on fastest mps would beat DB 97 in a match. >> >>My conclusion is that 5 years after the match, the commercial programs rule. I >>think that the gap was closed a couple of years ago. > >I'm sure you are approximately right, for various reasons, but Mr. Hyatt would >never let such an idea pass lying down! He will explain SO many reasons why it >is nonsense to say as above. >S.Taylor Right. His "chart" has DB 100 points higher than the next-closest program. Which has been _my_ point all along. grow up... and learn to read... or both...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.