Author: Hristo
Date: 02:54:50 04/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2002 at 05:36:59, maria clara benedicto wrote: >hmmmmmmmmm...... > >>>"...stuck on other issues that relate to eval-speed, has-hits, tb-hits,etc..... >>>....an we often lose the main criteria to determine the strength of a chess program..." > >to give face to them, > >"it's the exquisite pain, fatigue, hardships, ecstacy of the journey........." > yes ... and also the proud feeling of a _parent_ watching over a _child_!!! Whishing it to grow strong and successful. ;-) hristo >maria clara > > > >On April 10, 2002 at 02:48:48, Hristo wrote: > >>On April 10, 2002 at 01:24:55, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>3. Kramnik applies the best possible method to determine which of the two >>programs (machines) is stronger. He evaluates the actuall chess moves that are >>proposed or made over the course of a game. Most geeks, including me, get, >>often, stuck on other issues that relate to eval-speed, hash-hits, tb-hits, etc. >>... an we often lose the main criteria to determine the strength of a chess >>program. Nobody here, on this forum, would be able to sustain a direct assault >>in a regulation game against any of the top chess software. Kramnik can and >>will! When talking about chess Kramnik (and the like) can prove what thay talk >>about, the rest of us should sit back and take lessoons. :-) > >>Regards, >>hristo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.