Author: fca
Date: 08:58:55 08/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
Dear Ed Could you briefly clarify the points below - just Yes/No will do if you like. On August 03, 1998 at 08:55:25, Ed Schröder wrote: [...] >As for the >requested differences between Rebel9 and Rebel10: > >Positions tested : 506 Please, Ed, what sort of positions? Basically problem-type positions, or what? >Different moves : 48 >Different times : 349 (interval is -10%, +10%) I can put several meanings here. Does it mean that in 349 out of (506-48) positions (or 506 positions), the time taken to make the move by R10+Anti-GM(Strong)was either >110% or <90% of the time taken by R9? At what depth (or other?) setting? This 349 sounds like quite a significant number anyway! >Total time Rebel9 : 02:04:57 >Total time Rebel10 : 03:00:10 >Total percent : -31% Does this mean in this test set, at (presumably) a fixed depth setting, R10+Anti-GM(Strong) was 31% slower than R9? (I know Strong Anti-GM setting is not as wise as SMART). >Score differences Are these absolute (i.e. unsigned) differences - surely R10+Anti-GM(Off) can sometimes give lower evaluations at fixed depth than R9? You wrote below: >These figures are without the anti-GM options which is why I believe these differences are between R9 and R10+Anti-GM(Off). >Score 0.01 - 0.10 124 >Score 0.10 - 0.25 27 >Score 0.25 - 0.50 14 >Score 0.50 - 0.75 7 >Score 0.75 - 1.00 2 >Score 1.00 - 2.00 0 >Score > 2.00 4 i.e. total 178. How many showed 0.00 difference, please? Was it (506-48-178), or (506-178)? Sorry to ask so many questions, but I am sure many are very interested. Kind regards fca
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.