Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: chess Plans: how much than just a verbal device they are?

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 09:32:43 07/04/02


Hi all:
Plans is what the programs lacks, everyone say. OK, but maybe we should take a
more closer look that that word, "plan", and to see what really means in terms
of mental operations of a chess player. And then if they are esential to chess
perfomance instead than just for human-mental-chess-kind-of-perfomance.
I do not know, of course, how plans are made by IM's or GM's. But my guess is
that there are not too much different to ours, patzer or just experts planners,
that is to say, they make like us a general description of the situation and
what to do next. Sometimes this is verbalized in that kind of muted, uncomplete,
verbalization along which much mental processes go; sometimes even does no reach
-or surpass- that level and it is a kind of visual representation, even perhaps
a kind of locomotor predisposition, etc. I suppose this last one is the kind of
"description" of really good players. More verbalization equates less masterly
handling of an operation, except when writing or talking.
But then, how much useful is an appraisal in "general terms", no matter how it
was coded? I mean, beyond obvious situations where the mere word plan is
unnnecesary and pedantic, in the realm of complexity when positions does not
gives an inmediate answer to the question what-to-do, then I dare to say that
planning is less a good tool to play better than a sychological tool to feel you
are handling the game.  My equation is simple: the more complex the situation,
the more the need -sychological need- for "plans" seems to be, but the more
complex the situation is, for the same token the less adequate a general plan
is. I mean: more complex means more poverty of a plan, less fittness, less
usefulness.  I consider a plan for a complex situation like a crust that impedes
to see what is really happening in the board. I guess many games has been lost
less because of a bad plan than just for having a plan tha fix yor mind
obsesively in a purpose and so you becomes blind to reality.
In fact, chess programs probably has in his lack of plans at least part of the
reasons of his strenght.
BUt of course this is a tricky issue and I hope you will comment this, refute
this and teach me something I do not know.
My best
no plans fernando



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.