Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 05:04:01 07/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 20, 2002 at 06:29:30, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On July 20, 2002 at 05:55:43, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>I did not ask about single example from endgame but about
>>the middle game or about rating improvement.
>
>In the middlegame it will likely not even matter a factor of 2,
>so the gain will be negligile.
>
>But you will lose out badly in every endgame.
>
>--
>GCP

I think it matters "a factor of 2".

1) it helps you to prune
2) you get better evaluation in the upper plies when you can return a score
based on a deeper search.

number one will show itself directly because you iterate deeper, the second one
you don't "see", but it does improve depth along some branches in the same way.

-S.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.