Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 09:57:06 08/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2002 at 11:58:46, Chris Carson wrote: >On August 01, 2002 at 11:47:35, GuyHaworth wrote: > >>Did Hiarcs do enough to earn a GM norm, had it been carbon rather than silicon? >> >>Does FIDE acknowledge such achievements, or not? >> >>How can Hiarcs (or any engine) accumulate norms over time ... by proving that it >>is the same program that accumulated the previous norms ... given that ... >> >>Hardware/software combinations have a habit of evolving and might ... to quote a >>phrase ... go down as well as up. >> >>g > >GM norms are only for humans. FIDE will not allow any computer to play in FIDE >sanctioned events. Tiger, Junior, Fritz, Hiarcs, Rebel and the King all have >very good (2600 and 2700, norm strength) results. > >SW Versions and HW are important. The SSDF list is a very good reference and >Tony's page provides Human vs Computer results as well. Dear Chris, I'm back in the forum after a long absence. I was wondering if in this long discussed debate are we just comparing apples to oranges ( as many people think) or are we hitting against the human proudness that doesn't admit to be beaten by a piece of "hot silicon" running at tot Ghz. My Best, Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.