Author: Joseph Merolle
Date: 12:48:12 09/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
>You bring about some good points , however I included some corrections which I >hope serves to clarify your points. corection the word good in evaluating :-( more like ..... >You bring about some interesting conclusions concerning CM , however I included some corrections which I >hope serves to clarify your points. On September 08, 2002 at 15:43:12, Joseph Merolle wrote: >On September 08, 2002 at 15:35:51, Joseph Merolle wrote: > >>I was grateful for the gramatical corections, that is why I posted a thank you, >>however I did not feel conforatble when you concluded by advising me what I need >>to do. >>You mentions that men typically try to dominate people by reflecting their >>status. If it is in your will to do so, I would be grateful to know is this your >>opion, a nonequivalent-group design, quasi-experimental disign, or a simple >>correlational design? Secondly,with your statement, " My english translation for >>sensitive readers" a logical hypothesis to draw from this would also include >>women to dominate by status of intelligence. >>Lastly , If your interested in some alternitive ways of comminicationg the same >>information that is less condescending and will not make people feel judged. >>Feel free to study the folling. P.S. Your assuming I am male. >> >> >> >>"you need to use paragraphs and punctuation >>more. The spelling did not matter." >> >>vs. >> >>You bring about some good points , however I included some corrections which I >>hope serves to clarify your points. >> >> >>Spelling did not matter. >> >> >>vs. >> >> >>Nothing at all! >> >> >> >>This statement makes one feel that he or she is under your evaluation. >> >> >>my english translation for sensitive readers >> >>vs. >> >> >>This is another statement that is not needed unless you want to imply that the >>person is speaking another language, which is condescending. >> >> >>Regards >> >>J >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>On September 08, 2002 at 13:47:12, Stuzzi Kadent wrote: >>>On September 08, 2002 at 12:48:48, Joseph Merolle wrote: >>> >>>>Albert Elis the father of Rational emotional therapy would characterize your " >>>>you need " statement as irrational and would identify you as controling. Just >>>>something I learned with my masters dagree while leaning english (my third >>>>Language), however since completing my 2nd PhD in Psychotherapy I could have >>>>forgot somthing. However, please if you have a need to teach me something in >>>>punctuation go right ahead I dont want to stop you working out some issues. >>>> >>>>Regards >>>> >>>>Ph.D. M.D JAMerolle >>>> >>>>On September 08, 2002 at 12:10:17, Stuzzi Kadent wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 08, 2002 at 08:42:08, Joseph Merolle wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Thanks you so much english getting better! I will work on it >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On September 08, 2002 at 04:08:13, Stuzzi Kadent wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>John, unless Chessmaster has the features that Fritz has in the analysis suite >>>>>>>( Full Analysis ,blunder check, compare analysis , deep position analysis and >>>>>>>shootout) it will never be better!!! >>>>>>>I know just what you're going to say: we have similar features that do the same >>>>>>>thing. Bull, Chessmaster's idea of analysis is telling you what is going on in a >>>>>>>game, i.e. bishop blocks the check (what a joke), instead of telling you what >>>>>>>you did wrong with an alternative line of play, automatically computing the line >>>>>>>in the notation window with the option of playing through it. CM does have a >>>>>>>nice feature with audio advice, but give me a break, should I do this for every >>>>>>>move of the game if I want an alternative line for every move? Moreover with >>>>>>>audio advice you don't have the option of getting the new line of play in the >>>>>>>notation window to save and scroll though it, unless you do it manually. >>>>>>>CM might be the most popular program but it will never be the most popular >>>>>>>program with serious club players unless these features are offered like they >>>>>>>are in Fritz! However, if CM had these features I would be sold, but until then >>>>>>>I will stick with Fritz! CMs idea of making a program better is putting in more >>>>>>>tutorials and this won't cut it. If Ubisoft is really interested in making >>>>>>>a better program for 10,000 I would take these ideas to the drawing board. Or, >>>>>>>you can put in another 50 min of Josh and call it a new program (what a joke). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>with help from Stuzzi "Punctuations are your friends" Kadent >>>>> >>>>>Did not mean to cause offence, but you need to use paragraphs and punctuation >>>>>more. The spelling did not matter. >>> >>>You don't seem to realise how difficult what you wrote was to read. Which is why >>>you had no other responses. However, the need to feel clever and dominate people >>>by pointing to status like you do is very common in males. Goodbye.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.