Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:59:43 09/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2002 at 08:54:03, Sune Fischer wrote: >On September 27, 2002 at 08:43:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On September 27, 2002 at 08:22:06, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>On September 27, 2002 at 08:14:28, Gerrit Reubold wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Sune, >>>> >>>>On September 26, 2002 at 14:47:32, Sune Fischer wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 25, 2002 at 15:06:58, John Merlino wrote: >>>>>>correct if you switch. The "host" has nothing to do with it, because he/she MUST >>>>>>choose a door to open. >>>> >>>> >>>>>Not entirely correct, the host has got something to do with it. The host must >>>>>KNOW which door hides the car. It is vital that he doesn't open a door to a goat >>>>>by shear luck, because in that case you do not get that 2/3 odds. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I disagree, I am sure it doesn't matter whether the host opens a door (with a >>>>goat) KNOWING where the car is or by SHEAR LUCK. The candidate should switch in >>>>either case, thus improving his winning odds from 1/3 to 2/3. Of course, if the >>>>host doesn't know and opens the door with the car (accidently), the game is over >>>>:-) >>> >>>Ok, well at least we agree that if he KNOWS he should switch. >>> >>>So suppose the host doesn't know, and the host opens a door to a goat. >>> >>>What does this tell us? >>>Well, since he didn't know, it means he either had a 50% probability of opening >>>to a goat, or a 100% probability. >>> >>>He gets 100% probability if we are sitting on the car, and he gets 50% if the >>>car is behind the one of the doors he had to choose from. >>> >>>The odds of picking a goat if you have 100% probability is higher than if you >>>only have 50% (obviously), okay? >>> >>>Thus we now know it is more probable that we did pick the door with the car, >>>because the host was so lucky to pick one with a goat, which is a lot more >>>proabable if he had nothing but goats to choose from. >>> >> >>Err, Sune, is it true that if I, err, sit in two cars, that I should have two >>keys? The problem get's more complicated than expected, I must apologize, but >>what would be your verdict? > >I'm not sure I see your point? > >-S. Before the thread is exploding. You know, the basic problem is well suited to confuse people. Because it did already confuse the best mathematicians... Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.