Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:04:26 09/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2002 at 14:40:09, Gerrit Reubold wrote: >Uri, > >I think your model of the game is not a model of the situation which I am >discussing. > >Suppose you and me are playing the following game (f.ex. by email). > >1. I, the host, take an empty chessboard and put a single king one one of the >squares. Trust me that I don't cheat. You send me your guess which square this >might be. > >2. I assume you, the candidate, guess it is a1. > >3. I give you a hint: >The square is not one of > b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 h1 >a2 b2 c2 d2 e2 f2 g2 h2 >a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3 >a4 b4 c4 d4 e4 f4 g4 h4 >a5 b5 c5 d5 e5 f5 h5 >a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 g6 h6 >a7 b7 c7 d7 e7 f7 g7 h7 >a8 b8 c8 d8 e8 f8 g8 h8 > >(Note that it is no difference if I suddenly forgot on which square the king >stands, I decide to look only on the given 62 squares and, surprise, all of them >are empty.) It is important if you know where the king is. Suppose for the discussion that you also do not know where the king is so you always expose all the squares except a1 g5 after I choose a1. Suppose that we start to play 64000 games(most of them are not played because you discover the king in one of the 62 squares). Suppose that the king is in every suqare in 1000 cases Do you agree that it is logical to expect it? In 62000 games the king is not in a1 and not in g5 and the game is not played. Do you agree? in 1000 games the king is in a1 and I win by not switching. do you agree? In 1000 games the king is in g5 and I lose if I do not switch Do you agree? in 1000 games out of 2000 games that are played I win by not switching Do you agree? It means that the probability for me to win by not switching is exactly 1/2. Do you agree? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.