Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: chesstiger 15

Author: Chessfun

Date: 12:13:59 10/03/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 03, 2002 at 04:27:27, John Smith wrote:

>I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games
>to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of
>any particular program.  That being said, I have to agree with some posts that
>state that tiger 15 is weak.


As always a poor choice of words.


>In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I
>find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly
>gambit 2.  My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with
>tiger 14 or gambit2.

100 games? at what blitz? what were the time controls, what were the opponents,
what CPU's were on the other machines...etc...etc. Mine were 40/40 autoplayed on
two identical 1200 mhz machines.

So post the games, lets at least see what you think you are talking about.

Sarah.

• Re: chesstiger 15 John Smith 15:01:55 10/03/02
  • Re: chesstiger 15 Chessfun 15:20:46 10/03/02
    • my yahoo handle is... John Smith 20:04:04 10/03/02
      • MODERATION: John Smith please read Christophe Theron 09:05:56 10/04/02
        • What do mean Mr Theoron??? John Smith 11:48:28 10/04/02
          • Re: What do mean Mr Theoron??? Christophe Theron 07:57:20 10/05/02
            • complaints about my posts?? John Smith 11:53:19 10/05/02
              • Re: It wasn't me Chessfun 11:58:22 10/05/02
          • Re: What do mean Mr Theoron??? Chessfun 13:01:25 10/04/02
      • Re: my yahoo handle is... Chessfun 04:50:07 10/04/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.