Author: mike schoonover
Date: 16:20:12 10/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
translation using google.
regards
mike
I find the homepage von Franz Wiesenecker very interesting. It tests at present
Ruffian (left see below). Its result: The largest weakness of Ruffian lies in
its king security lacking, as well as a badly optimized book. In the book I
have still no weaknesses found however am to assume that it some holes have
(because nevertheless too narrowly) so that it will again and again seem that
Ruffian in case of opening of the opponent will fall - Franz writes also
believes I. There one should plug the holes, only: soetwas cannot go from
today on tomorrow! Thus: how quickly is it to go? Written for the
professionals already for many years books will become, constantly them improved
and getunt. I think that it with Ruffian now will be similar, because within
shortest time one has now thousands of portions to be present! That had like
that not been before the case. Further: not yet completely as there king
security is with Ruffian as with the other Progs. That is because of the fact
that Ruffian rather takes the opposing king in the visor than the own to protect
before. Naturally against strong opponents, the shot can go in such a way,
particularly also to the rear. I am me however reliably that a programmer there
still some will improve, and likewise the book. Here down (in addition see
comment on Franz's side) to see we a ausgefuchste killer lightning portion: [
Event "lightning 5 '" ] [ Site "?"] [ DATE "2002.??.??" ] [ Round "?"] [
White "Ruffian 1,0,1" ] [ Black "Ios" ] [ Result "0-1" ] [ ECO "B00" ] 1. e4
Nc6 2. Nf3 f5 3rd exf5 d5 4. Nh4 e5 5. Qh5+ g6 6th fxg6 Nf6 7th g7+ Nxh5 8.
gxh8=Q Qxh4 9. Qxh7 Nd4 10. c3 Bf5 11. Bb5+ c6 12. Qxb7 Qe4+ 13. Kf1 cxb5
14. Qxa8+ Kf7 15. Qxa7+ Be7 16. Qxd4 exd4 17. h3 Nf4 18. d3 Qxg2+ 19. Ke1
Qxh1+ 20. Kd2 Qf3 21st cxd4 Qxd3+ 22. Ke1 Qe2+ 0-1 Ruffian comes (does not
know approximately whom?) here powerfully under the wheels, and loses after
already 22 courses! Reason: Ruffian flies soon from the book, and plays 4.
Nh4 instead of the runner to develop according to my opinion played Ruffian this
course however rather because it on the gegenerischen king was sharp, and
because he does not have his own not enough secured thereby. I played and could
numerous (hundreds) of killer variants against Fritz, loosely from the stool
such-like portions in dozen commodity offer - I have already. Since the version
7 has now frays rotten of some improved - even if I could likewise killen F7.
With Fritz 6 however I could down-reel so loosely xx times everything, and
against Shredder (before SMK the radical emergency brake pulled, as Shredder
accepts now no Trojaner, all the same whether correct or wrong! I could
killen Shredder as desired. Doesn't Shredder have so "only an artificial" king
security implemented gotten now - because figures are not struck also then if
garnix threaten? -) From Ruffian in the above portion likewise likewise in
principle a killer variant succeeded to the opponent. Sowas something similar
praesetiere I against Fritz 7 in lightning 5' whenever you want! I would not
like to defend by any means one money the king security of Ruffian, also the
holes in the book am probably there. On "its computer" the Gegener has by
Ruffian seen that the program with Nh4 into the trap would grope. What would
have happened however, Ruffian instead of Nh4, simply Bd3 would have played?
Here an analysis of the position from Ruffian to course 3: Ruffian 1,0,1 - Ios
r1bqkbnr/ppp1p1pp/2n5/3p1P2/8/5N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq d6 0 1 analysis by
Ruffian 1.0.1: 4.Sh4 Sh6 5.Dh5+ Sf7 6.g3 g6 7.fxg6 hxg6 8.Dd1 Dd6 9.Sc3 e5
10.Lb5 ² (0.69) depth: 11/25 00:00:45 11977kN 4.Lb5 Dd6 5.Lxc6+ bxc6 6,0-0 Lxf5
7.Te1 0-0-0 8.Se5 Sh6 9.d4 Kb8 10.Lf4 ± (0.76) depth: 11/25 00:00:57 15474kN
4.Ld3 Dd6 5,0-0 Ld7 6.Te1 Sf6 7.Sg5 Se5 8.Se6 Lxe6 ± (0.86) depth: 11/25
00:01:18 21180kN 4.Ld3 Dd6 5,0-0 Sf6 6.Sc3 Sb4 7.Lb5+ c6 8.La4 b5 9.Lb3 Lxf5
10.Te1 ± (0.89) depth: 12/28 00:01:43 28088kN as one sees, rejects Ruffian to
Nh4, plays sometime then Bb5 and afterwards Bd3!? We leave it simply alone with
4. Bd3. What now? Is white then lost? I hardly believe that (however I can
undertake times a close match starting from the position as experiment;)! That
Fritz 7 does not play instead of Nh4 dear Bb5 says nevertheless from that it Nh4
as the loss course sees - in the opposite, here the analysis of Fritz 7,008
after course 8: r1b1kb1Q/ppp4p/2n5/3pp2n/7q/8/PPPP1PPP/RNB1KB1R w KQq - 0 1
analysis by Fritz 7: 9.Dxh7 -- + - (2.16) depth: 12/37 00:00:51 14925kN 9.Dxh7
+ - (2.16) depth: 12/39 00:01:19 23139kN in short: The opponent has in the
analysis recognized the fact that Ruffian with it accurately Nh4 in lightning 5'
would play and developed a killer variant on it! If Fritz 7 would play the same
course, then he to feel likewise keineswegst bad, even in the course 9 +2 for
itself to indicate, and nevertheless exactly the same the brook down-go. That
is however nothing new under the chess sun! (time becomes probably slow that I
unites similar holes with DF7 points out?) As I already mentioned above, the
difference lies whether Ruffian (there in lightning 5 ') plays Nh4 or Bd3 only
in for instance 30' (on my lame computer!). Thus has I seoeben the position
out-play to let, in lightning 25' +2 "(dual corresponds to 2x2000 lightning 5')
Fritz 7, after Ruffian beautifully placed its Springer over a3->c2->e3,
regarding the central play was outmaneuvered and went down! What says us thus?
Here this portion: [ Event "P600, Blitz:25'+2" "] [ Site"?"] [ DATE
"2002.??.??" ] [ Round "?"] [ White "Ruffian 1,0,1" ] [ Black "Fritz 7" ] [
Result "1-0" ] [ FEN "r1bqkbnr/ppp1p1pp/2n5/3p1P2/8/3B1N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQK2R b
qkQK -" ] { W=12.6 ply; 367kN/s B=12.6 ply; 310kN/s } Qd6 { 0.62/12 58} 5.
o-o { 0.91/11 48 } g6 { (Sh6) 0.66/11 41} 6. Nh4 { 1.14/10 35 } Qf6 { (Se5)
0.00/11 46} 7. g3 { (Sf3) 1.05/12 59} Bxf5 { (gxf5) 0.19/11 60} 8. Nxf5 {
1.26/12 16 } gxf5 { - 0.06/12 15 } 9. Qh5+ { 0.93/14 56 } Qg6 { 0.09/14 50 }
10. Qxf5 { 1.00/14 30 } Qxf5 { 0.28/13 27 } 11. Bxf5 { 0.90/13 12 } Nd4 {
(Sh6) 0.22/13 37} 12. Bd3 { 1.10/13 26 } e5 { 0.31/13 67 } 13. c3 { (f3)
1.19/13 40} e4 { (Sf3+) 0.00/15 37} 14th cxd4 { 1.10/14 56 } exd3 { 0.00/13 7 }
15. Re1+ { 0.99/14 38 } Ne7 { 0.22/14 27 } 16. Re3 { 1.11/14 32 } o-o-o {
0.22/13 28 } 17. Na3 { 1.15/14 24 } Re8 { (Sf5) 0.28/13 26} 18. Rxd3 { 1.29/13
43 } Bg7 { 0.41/13 36 } 19. Nc2 { 1.27/12 22 } Nf5 { 0.50/12 36 } 20. b3 {
(g4) 1.29/12 23} Rhf8 { (Te4) 0.53/11 33} 21. Ba3 { 1.49/11 22 } Rf6 { (Tf7)
0.72/11 27} 22. Ne3 { 1.66/11 25 } c6 { (Te4) 1.00/12 58} 23. Rc1 { 1.76/12 26
} Kd7 { (Te4) 0.62/12 26} 24. Bc5 { (Kg2) 1.90/11 21} b6 { 0.56/12 26 } 25.
Ba3 { 2.01/12 33 } h5 { (Te4) 0.59/11 35} 26. Kg2 { (Kf1) 1.95/11 109} Rf7 {
0.59/12 26 } 27. Bb2 { (Sxf5) 1.96/11 32} Nd6 { (a6) 0.69/12 29} 28. f3 {
1.98/10 24 } a5 { 0.69/11 27 } 29. a3 { (g4) 1.94/11 19} Ref8 { 0.69/12 37 }
30. f4 { (Tf1) 1.93/11 17} Ra8 { (Te8) 0.56/11 20} 31. a4 { 1.94/11 14 } Rg8 {
(Te8) 0.31/11 16} 32. Rc2 { (Kf3) 1.90/10 15} Ne4 { 0.31/12 19 } 33. Kf3 {
1.86/10 16 } Bf6 { (Te8) 0.28/11 21} 34. Ba3 { 1.59/12 36 } Bh8 { (Ld8) 0.34/11
37} 35. Rc1 { (Tb2) 1.62/11 24} Ng5+ { (h4) 0.41/11 15} 36. Ke2 { 1.84/12 13 }
Ne4 { 0.31/11 13 } 37. Rf1 { 1.83/12 24 } Re8 { 0.44/11 17 } 38. Kd1 { (b4)
1.82/12 23} Bg7 { (Lf6) 0.41/12 17} 39. Nc2 { (f5) 2.03/11 13} Ng5 { (Sf6)
0.66/11 12} 40. Re3 { 2.00/12 12 } Rxe3 { 0.78/13 29 } 41st dxe3 { 2.07/13 19 }
Ne4 { 0.72/12 14 } 42. Ne1 { 2.15/12 18 } c5 { (Ke6) 0.91/11 17} 43. Nf3 {
2.07/12 20 } Re7 { (cxd4) 0.97/10 12} 44. Ke2 { 2.32/11 17 } Kd6 { (Te8)
1.25/11 25} 45. Rc1 { (Sd2) 2.36/11 10} Rc7 { (Te8) 1.62/11 11} 46. Ng5 {
(Sd2) 2.54/12 18} Nxg5 { 1.59/13 15 } 47th fxg5 { 2.58/12 6 } Rc8 { (Lf8)
1.66/13 13} 48. h4 { (dxc5+) 3.13/12 9} Rc7 { (Lf8) 2.09/12 10} 49. g4 {
3.43/12 9 } hxg4 { 2.44/13 13 } 50. h5 { 3.46/12 15 } Bh8 { (Lf8) 2.56/12 18}
51. h6 { (dxc5+) 4.27/12 16} Ke6 { (g3) 2.84/12 10} 52. g6 { (dxc5) 4.40/12 9}
Kf5 { 2.66/13 13 } 53. g7 { 4.30/11 3 } Bxg7 { 3.06/14 15 } 54th hxg7 { 4.43/11
3 } Rxg7 { 3.19/13 9 } 55th dxc5 { 4.39/13 12 } bxc5 { 3.19/12 7 } 56. Rxc5 {
4.81/13 15 } Ke4 { 3.37/13 11 } 57. Rxa5 { 5.01/12 4 } Rh7 { (g3) 3.37/13 13}
58. Kf2 { 5.25/14 13 } Rh2+ { 3.44/13 9 } 59. Kg3 { 5.23/14 5 } Rh3+ { 3.66/13
8 } 60. Kxg4 { 5.24/14 6 } Rxe3 { 3.78/13 9 } 61. Rb5 { 5.43/13 10 } d4 {
3.87/11 7 } 62. a5 { (Ld6) 5.53/12 7} Re1 { (d3) 4.03/12 10} 63. a6 { 5.76/11
7 } Rg1+ { 4.41/12 16 } 64. Kh4 { 5.99/12 10 } Kf4 { (Tg7) 4.62/11 15} 65.
Bd6+ { 6.64/9 2 } Ke4 { (Ke3) 5.66/12 15} 66. Re5+ { (Tb4) 6.64/10 7} Kd3 {
(Kf3) 5.31/11 6} 67. a7 { 7.26/12 7 } Ra1 { 6.50/12 6 } 68. Bc5 { 8.04/14 11 }
Ra6 { (Kc3) 7.44/11 8} 69. Rd5 { 8.26/13 7 } Kc3 { 8.44/11 5 } 70. Rd6 {
(Lxd4+) 8.61/13 6} Ra5 { 8.44/11 4 } 71. b4 { (Lxd4+) 8.60/12 3} 1-0 Eduard
Home Franz Wiesenecker:
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.