Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:48:39 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 07:45:12, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 07:39:12, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 07:29:16, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Novelty can be also a tactical idea that humans never considered and a computer >>>can find after some minutes or some hours of search. >>> >>>The idea does not have to be idea to win material but can also be an idea to win >>>something positional but you need to calculate a lot of plies forward in order >>>to find it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Sure, that should be possible, but that computers get into that mode to be able >>to get a positional understanding of a position, seems improbable. Then it's >>more probable that chess will be solved. The point is that positional >>understanding depends always on complexity and entirety (German: Ganzheit). And >>to repeat a common saying, entirety is more than the sum of the parts. >> >>Rolf Zueschen > >Computers have positional understanding. >It is a fact that no good program use only material evaluation. > >It is possible that they may find a novelty to achieve positional advantage. > >Uri >Uri It's very human if hope dies at the latest moment. But I would be happy if you wre right. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.