Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 18:49:18 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 20:07:56, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On October 09, 2002 at 12:23:27, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On October 09, 2002 at 07:58:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>Geschenkt. But I have a still worse discovery here. You wrote: >>> >>>"IMHO even a 1900+ player might have some chances for at least a whole >>>point in this match being familiar with DF style and the biggest part >>>of its opening book." >>> >>>Dream on, Günther! You are badly wrong here. Totally wrong. Even if you were >>>able to hold the complete data in your memory you would not be able to master >>>the technique problems later. You are talking like the pupil who's learning his >>>first language and who thinks that now he could understand the conservation in >>>that particular land. Or the student who heard or read something and then >>>thought that he had understood it and now could explain it to other students. If >>>you ever tried it you would have seen that such processes are not similar. >>>Passive knowledge is different to practical abilities. I hope I could give you >>>some important information. >>> >>>Rolf Tueschen >> >>May be we should get more specific: >>dont you think that Kramniks team wasnt able to find 12...Bf8, when they >>invented the novelty 9.Kf1!? dont you think they looked 7 plies more >>into DF thoughts when flags _didnt play any role_ because DF could not >>know this novelty which appeared after an usual wellknown opening? >>Of course we can believe what Kramnik stated until now but how often >>did players of important matches showed their secrets _after_ the match? >>Why do you call this still a conspiracy? I call it professional biz... > >I could see that Roy did already answer you. That is one point. The other is >that I do not understand you, what you mean with your idea that he might have >had it on the board. Let's try to analyse what you are saying and perhaps >meaning. > >1. This is a match and nobody would tell the press and the opposite side what's >really going on. Is that correct? I would agree with you. > >2. Your idea is that because Kramnik had Bf8 on the board he could prepare the >whole game in advance. Is that correct? But then he should have forgotten Bc4? > >I have a completely different view. But my view is also not the whole truth! >Perhaps it's completely wrong. But tell me what you are thinking if you read >this... > >(1) Kramnik played Fritz also in Blitz for years. He knows what Fritz can >achieve. > >(2) Deep in Kramnik's heart or conscience there's the following view: > >- Fritz is absolutely stupid positionally >- Fritz is dangerous for a player who is sloppy in his calculations >- I have only a good chance against Fritz if I am well prepared mentally and >psychologically, it will be hard work to win the games, because I must be >concentrated for the whole game >- the biggest problem for me is the question of the money! I'm Russian and I >don't want to present the Western World a Russian who is only greedy at the >money >- my idea ist the following: I can only justify the million dollar prize money >if I play some extraordinary chess games >- by doing that I get into theopposition of these nice people from chessbase >- but since the horror trip in 1997 the World of chess is awaiting someone toset >the record straight. So I must beat FRITZ with a clear result. Fritz is not DB2 >but if I beat the terribly strong Fritz (in the eyes of the computer chess >lovers) I can stir the emotions PRO computer chess and a new spring will bring >golden times for CC >- so, yes, I've found the solution: I am in the zwick or the zugzwang that I >must beat FRITZ with a high result. To prevent that I'm regarded as the asshole >of CC for the next decades I will show to each chess programmer how far they are >away from the beauties of chess. I will create beautiful games where FRITZ >simply is stumbling like the Bear Sonny Liston when got his knock-out against >Cassius Clay. Also Liston was dangerous like hell, but Clay was dancing and >stinging like a bee. So that I will prove them. So that they learn some >humility. And then perhaps they understand how they should treat us chess >masters. With respect! >- But to achieve that I will create some little masterpieces which will even >recognized by the folks of INFORMATOR >- I can only hope that Frederic could understand me and that he won't boycott me >in the future > >[- The problem I couldn't solve yet is, who on Earth could be my speaker to the >World. Well, it could only be a congenial deep thinker. Perhaps someone unknown >in the world of chess. Yes, perhaps Rolf from CCC.......] > >===================================================================== > >That could be the thoughts of Vladimir Kramnik! And if he will win the show >against FRITZ we should thank him a million times because he has brought back >chess into CC! > >You out there - could you hear me calling? All together now we must walk into a >different direction in CC. This time we go with chess hand in hand! > > >===================================================================== > > > >>(To the other stuff: I thought you were at the side who does not exaggerate >>the abilities of chess progs but it seems you changed your point of view >>totally since a while > >Err, I don't know what you are talking about. I did NOT change my view. I think >that we must bring back chess into CC and therefore I'm so happy that Vladimir >is playing such wonderful masterpieces! From now on we have two different >department of chess. We have the traditional chess, called human chess. And we >have Anti-computer chess. Here Kramnik has opened a new category. The chess >without spectacular tricks or sacrifices but simply solid chess with piecesthe >usual computer program has no business with. Perhaps even Kasparov is now again >back in the boat. Kramnik is the one who showed the whole world how machines >must be outplayed. Not in the timid Huebner style but with artistic elegance! > >A new epoch of chess has just begun. > >Yours truly > >Rolf Tueschen ====================================================================== Too early I hit enter before I could give it a new subject. In my Small Talk about CCI reveiled the whole truth: read here in English: http://hometown.aol.de/rolftueschen/smalltalk.html Thanks Vladimir! ;) Rolf Tueschen > > > >- I played >500 tournament games in the late eighties >>until around 1998 and played X thousands of computer games so think I know >>a bit of what I am talkin about - I even had some little contribution >>to the general opening theory when I was much more active) >> >>Günther Simon
This page took 0.42 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.