Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:04:21 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2002 at 06:51:47, Alessandro Damiani wrote: Wrong, selectivity 0 at fritz gives it a complete fullwidth search. Quote: Frans Morsch >On October 10, 2002 at 02:01:51, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 09, 2002 at 23:06:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>I had to stop the experiment sooner than I wanted, but I did find some >>>interesting things out. >>> >>>1. at _very_ fast time controls (40 moves in 1 minute) null-move completely >>>destroys non-null-move >>>by a ridiculous margin. (this ended something like 60 wins, 5 losses, 8 draws) >>> >>>2. At longer time controls (40 moves in 10 minutes) non-null-move catches up >>>somewhat. It still loses >>>far more than it wins, but not _nearly_ so bad as test 1. (this was closer, but >>>with fewer games played) >> >>It seems based on your data that null move is more important for blitz and not >>for long time control. >> >>Interesting to know also the difference in plies >> >>If I compare depth after 3 minutes of search then I see for deep Fritz 3-5 plies >>difference at 3 minutes per move between selectivity 0 and the default value 2. >> > >By using a program with unknown source code you cannot be sure that >selectivity=2 is only related to null-move. > >Alessandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.