Author: Uri Blass
Date: 17:58:39 10/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2002 at 18:14:56, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On October 17, 2002 at 13:09:58, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 17, 2002 at 06:46:50, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>You don't put on your 20GB harddrive box that it is >>a 14(6) GB harddrive. >> >>Instead you sell it as 20GB. > >If you have 2 partitions on it, you can split it that way. Or do you think you >should write that one partition is 20GB and the other is 6? > >>You are a complete idiot if you believe that 12(6) is 18 ply. > >I don't think I said anywhere that I believe 12(6) _is_ 18 ply. But I'm pretty >sure it's more than 12. > >>There is so many statements now which if you litterary interpret them >>means that 12(6) = 12 ply. >> >>The clearest statement is the advances of artificial intelligence. >> >>It seems to me that the only person who tries to present things better >>than they are is Hsu. > >Hsu is the one who said 12 ply - how is that trying to present things better >than they are? More like worse. Based on other things that he said(deeper blue is better than deep Fritz) it seems that Hsu is not the person who tries to present things worse than they are so if he says 12 plies he cannot mean more than what is considered as 12 plies by people except extensions. > >>The documents which clearly state non-ambigious 12 ply are written >>by 3 persons and proofreaded. > >The paper that states '12.2 ply' says that is the iteration depth, which is >software. No I did not see where they said that the iteration depth is the software I remember that they even said that iteration x means depth x-4 in the software(I understood that it was about deep blue Junior and not about deeper blue but I guess that the word iteration has similiar meaning in deeper blue). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.