Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:06:16 10/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2002 at 17:34:38, Richard Pijl wrote: >On October 21, 2002 at 16:49:05, Johan Hutting wrote: > >>On October 21, 2002 at 16:19:57, Richard Pijl wrote: >> >>>>'clearly better' is a bit harsch I suppose. I valued (a stable) ant at ~2300, >>>>while baron is ~2200. It's been a while since I tested with Baron though. >>> >>>Which rating list have you been using? >> >>I only consider Andreas Hermann's list usually, but unfortunately he stopped. >>However, I was referring to the games baron played on my comp vs celes. I >>downloaded it a couple of months ago, so it's possible that the version is >>rather weak. I guess the use of 'is' is a bit confusing :) I meant I valued the >>build I had at around 2200 > >That would probably be either 0.33 or 0.35. You'll have to add at least a 100 >points for the version playing at Leiden ... > >Richard. I guess that it is something older. 0.33 got better result than Ant at the 3th division. The public Ant is only a 3th division program. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.