Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Dutch Open Leiden after round 6

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 15:06:16 10/21/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 21, 2002 at 17:34:38, Richard Pijl wrote:

>On October 21, 2002 at 16:49:05, Johan Hutting wrote:
>>On October 21, 2002 at 16:19:57, Richard Pijl wrote:
>>>>'clearly better' is a bit harsch I suppose. I valued (a stable) ant at ~2300,
>>>>while baron is ~2200. It's been a while since I tested with Baron though.
>>>Which rating list have you been using?
>>I only consider Andreas Hermann's list usually, but unfortunately he stopped.
>>However, I was referring to the games baron played on my comp vs celes. I
>>downloaded it a couple of months ago, so it's possible that the version is
>>rather weak. I guess the use of 'is' is a bit confusing :) I meant I valued the
>>build I had at around 2200
>That would probably be either 0.33 or 0.35. You'll have to add at least a 100
>points for the version playing at Leiden ...

I guess that it is something older.

0.33 got better result than Ant at the 3th division.
The public Ant is only a 3th division program.


This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.