Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 03:12:35 10/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2002 at 18:04:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 23, 2002 at 16:18:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 23, 2002 at 15:19:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On October 23, 2002 at 15:16:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>A couple of classics come to mind that are easy to find. >>> >>>1. Kasparov blundered in game 2 of the DB match in 1997. He resigned a drawn >>>position. >>> >>>2. Kasparov blundered in game 6 and blew an opening sequence of moves and lost. >>> >>>It is interesting that we see _more_ mistakes against computers. >>> >>>My theory is that the computers simply notice the mistakes that humans might >>>well overlook... >> >>Today games of GM's are analyzed by chess programs so this excuse cannot explain >>finding more blunders of GM's against computers. >> >>I also do not remember big blunders of GM smirin against computers and smirin >>played at faster time control. >> >>Uri > > >We were not just talking about GM vs computers. But GMs vs _anything_. The >point was >that against humans, many mistakes get overlooked. Against computers, it is >much less likely >to be missed unless it is way too deep... Your point is wrong. Please show me kasparov-kramnik games and how many 1b blunders they make there. Of course if they have a won position and win the position (even if there is a mate in 11 or whatever) that doesn't count. It's about blowing won positions to a draw or a loss and a drawn position to a loss. That's the key thing. I won't say i will play a russian roulette if there has been such a blunder in the kasparov-kramnik games, but i could do the bet. You won't find *any*. Even when kramnik was 16 years old...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.