Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:16:04 10/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2002 at 09:04:17, Tony Werten wrote: >On October 24, 2002 at 03:21:41, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: > >>On October 24, 2002 at 01:37:04, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>1)I do not agree that elostat is more accurate than chessbase rating. >>> >>>I see that Genius is almost last place by elostat. >>>Genius has 0%. >>> >>>My question is how can a program with 0% get a rating? >>> >>>Chessbase is smarter than elostat and at least does not give rating for programs >>>with 0%. >> >>Maybe a good question to the author of ELOSTAT ? >> >>>2)I think that something is wrong in the list because genius is known to be >>>strong at fast time control and I believe that the probability for it to get 0% >>>in more than 10 games is very small even if it plays against the top programs. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I agree with you. Further Genius 6,5 testing is needed; I must say that >>Millenium's Chess System isn't that much "user friendly" when it stands to add >>other engines to test against Genius. >>Maybe I'll try some AUTO232 matchs with Blitz time controls with increment (1 or >>2 seconds). >> >>I've already tried to match Genius against the new Crafty 19, Genius got totally >>overplayed by Crafty (1 min. bullet - KO match), but in 2 games Genius won BY >>TIME, I don't know if this was a GUI issue as the final position of both games >>are a clear win for Crafty (and I don't think Crafty is slower than Genius and >>could loose by forfeiting on time): >> > >Actually that's Bob's main reason for saying you should keep pondering on: >Crafty's timemanagement get screwed with ponder off. Well, he seems to be right. No Crafty is not supposed to lose on time with ponder off. The reason is probably different. I guess that at least one of the following happened 1)the game was not played under winboard or chessbase 2)some unstable version of windows was used. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.