Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 02:24:39 10/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
>the idea of evaluation the chances to win, instead of giving an evaluation >that is MATERIAL+POSITIONAL sounds very similar to CSTal's evaluation. > >CSTal has no "accurate" evaluation, instead the evaluation shows how >high the chances are to win. > >this helps cstal to plan a king attack e.g. Nonsense. It doesn't matter what units you use to give scores to a move: pawns, probability, whatever. You still need to figure out which move is better than the others. You can do this with three probabilities, but it will result the exact same 1-dimensional list of moves where one is considered better than others (or equally good). And what on earth has king attack to do with this??? Where did you get that one? Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.