Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Test Position

Author: Jim Monaghan

Date: 05:11:04 11/18/02


Milan posted an interesting game in the WB forum.

AMD XP 1600+
Single 1700 MHz
32 MB Hash
ponder off
Deep Fritz 7 GUI
Time 60/60' + 20/20' + 10'
Shredder6.ctg for all / read only.


[Event "3"]
[Site "s"]
[Date "2002.11.15"]
[Round "2"]
[White "The King 3.23KURT"]
[Black "Shredder 6.02"]
[ECO "C44"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. e4 {0} e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0} 3. c3 {0} Nf6 {0} 4. d4
{0} d6 {0} 5. Bd3 {0} g6 {0} 6. O-O {0} Bg7 {0} 7. h3 {0}
O-O { 0} 8. Nbd2 {0} Nh5 {0} 9. Nb3 {0} exd4 {0.45/13 103}
10. cxd4 { 0.68/11 74} Re8 {(h6) 0.37/12 52} 11. Bg5 {(Re1)
0.88/12 137} Bf6 { 0.29/12 36} 12. Be3 {(Qc1) 0.81/11 58}
Nb4 {(a5) 0.40/12 63} 13. Bb1 { 0.85/12 96} Be6 {(Nc6)
0.30/12 77} 14. a3 {(Re1) 0.85/11 80} Na6 { 0.21/12 48}
15. Na5 {(Ba2) 0.91/11 82} Bc8 {(Bg7) 0.52/12 82} 16. e5 {
0.98/11 87} c6 {(c5) 0.56/13 69} 17. Nc4 {(Nxc6) 0.97/11
80} Be7 { 0.85/13 61} 18. exd6 {0.86/11 86} Bxd6 {0.58/11
8} 19. Nxd6 {0.86/10 78} Qxd6 {0.69/12 9} 20. Ng5 {0.94/10
57} Nc7 {0.47/13 102} 21. Ne4 { 0.78/11 76} Qf8 {0.51/12
65} 22. Nc3 {(Qb3) 0.73/10 47} Be6 { (Ng3) 0.19/13 54}
23. Re1 {0.61/11 95} Bd5 {(f5) 0.20/12 70} 24. Bd3 {
0.71/11 73} Qd6 {0.35/12 72} 25. Rc1 {(Qg4) 0.79/10 69} Re7
{ (Nf4) 0.18/12 138} 26. Qa4 {0.84/10 63} Nf4 {0.26/13 122}
27. Bf1 { 0.69/11 72} Nfe6 {(Ree8) 0.20/12 101} 28. f3
{(Qa5) 0.58/11 117} f5 {0.09/12 91} 29. Bf2 {0.50/11 122}
Kh8 {(a5) 0.02/12 126} 30. Qc2 { (Re5) 0.66/10 59} Rae8
{-0.16/13 72} 31. Re5 {(Bh4) 0.64/10 89} Bxf3 {(Rd8)
-0.14/11 52} 32. gxf3 {0.77/11 55} Nxd4 {0.51/14 103}
33. Rxe7 {0.70/12 39} Nxc2 {0.31/14 61} 34. Rxe8+ {0.71/12
21} Nxe8 { 0.26/15 84} 35. Rxc2 {0.74/12 30} Qf4 {(b6)
0.27/14 82} 36. Re2 { (Bg2) 0.93/12 58} Nd6 {0.13/13 25}
37. Bg2 {(Re6) 0.83/12 64} b6 { 0.01/15 67} 38. Re6 {(Re3)
0.80/11 42} Qd2 {(Kg8) 0.02/14 86} 39. f4 { 0.95/11 45} Kg7
{(Kg8) -0.04/13 67} 40. Bxc6 {0.93/11 54} Qxf4 { 0.03/14
70} 41. Bg2 {(Re7+) 0.91/11 60} Nc4 {(Kf8) -0.02/13 68}
42. Ne2 { (Re7+) 0.92/11 38} Qg5 {(Qd2) 0.07/13 59} 43. Kh2
{1.06/11 53} Qd8 {(Qd2) 0.04/12 70} 44. Bd4+ {(Nd4) 0.87/11
77} Kg8 {0.03/13 44} 45. Bc3 { (Bc6) 1.05/11 52} Kf7
{0.05/12 78} 46. Rf6+ {1.05/12 101} Ke8 { (Qxf6) 0.15/14
93} 47. Rc6 {1.15/10 35} Na5 {(Qh4) 0.10/13 42} 48. Re6+ {
1.32/12 34} Kd7 {0.04/13 49} 49. Bf6 {1.32/12 44} Qc7+
{0.41/15 43} 50. Be5 {1.48/13 21} Qc2 {0.41/15 101}
51. Rd6+ {(Nd4) 1.55/12 46} Ke8 {0.50/15 92} 52. Nf4
{1.51/12 57} g5 {(Qf2) 0.50/14 100} 53. Nd5 { (Ne6) 1.90/12
62} f4 {(Nc4) 1.68/14 143} 54. Re6+ {2.37/11 51} Kf7
{1.95/14 99} 55. Re7+ {2.94/11 54} Kg6 {2.28/14 49} 56. Bc3
{2.94/10 44} f3 {(Nb3) 2.23/11 42} 57. Rg7+ {4.18/13 51}
Kh5 {2.85/15 23} 58. Nf6+ {4.19/13 52} Kh6 {3.47/15 32}
59. Ng4+ {4.25/13 88} Kh5 { 3.47/7 0} 60. Rxh7+ {4.25/13
51} Kg6 {(Qxh7) 3.63/14 19} 61. Rh6+ { 4.39/11 27} Kf7
{3.71/14 39} 62. Ne5+ {(Rf6+) 4.46/11 59} Kg7 { (Ke8)
0.75/16 225} 63. Rg6+ {4.95/13 40} Kh7 {(Qxg6) 6.00/16 105}
64. Rxg5 {5.65/10 22} Qc1 {6.08/13 87} 65. Rh5+ {6.06/11
73} Kg8 { 6.08/13 86} 66. Bxf3 {6.08/10 66} Kf8 {6.94/11
156} 67. Rh8+ {6.24/9 40} Ke7 {6.14/10 12} 68. Rh7+ {6.25/9
44} Kd8 {(Ke8) 6.59/12 78} 69. Rxa7 {6.87/10 68} Kc8
{6.78/12 54} 70. Re7 {(Rf7) 7.43/11 64} Kd8 { 8.66/13 96}
71. Bb4 {7.59/11 45} 1-0

The following position shows an interesting evaluation error.

[D] 4r2k/ppn1r2p/2pqn1p1/3bRp2/3P4/P1N2P1P/1PQ2BP1/2R2BK1 b - -


The setting is a fairly complex, crowded middlegame with perhaps roughly level
(that is not to say drawish) chances. The King has slightly the worse pawn
structure being hampered somewhat by an isolated d-pawn. In compensation, he has
the two bishops which if the position opens up could become very powerful.
Black's pawn formation is more compact (only two pawn islands) yet his kingside
is rather airy and he is somewhat weak on the dark squares. Most of his pawns
have moved to light squares and he is lacking his KB. A factor which could
become deadly should the position open up. I don't see an active plan for him.
If he advances his king-side pawns to attack the White castled position, the
resulting open lines and weak dark squares would probably rebound on him. In
view of this, Black should simply hold pat and play a waiting game.

Instead, Shredder uncorks 31... Bxf3?!  This leads to an  unbalanced material
situation with blurred positional values. The move is a pretty idea with a
forced variation that leads to this position:

[D] 4n2k/pp5p/2pq2p1/5p2/8/P1N2P1P/1PR2B2/5BK1 b - -

Black has a Q+N+6Ps vs R+2Bs+N+4Ps. The difference is Q+Ps vs R+2Bs, statically
that's 13=13. But, White's two bishops acting in concert in an open position is
certainly worth more than "6". Black's pawns are better. White's pawns are
broken up on the king-side, but are they really weak? Black has hardly anything
left to attack them with. I would think it's only a matter of time, before White
unravels his temporarily awkwardly placed pieces and gets them co-ordinated to
penetrate the Black position. This is exactly what happened in the game.

At 14 ply and over 20 minutes later, Shredder still wants to go into the line.

  7.01	 0:01 	+0.61 	31...c5 32.Nxd5 Nxd5 33.Ree1 cxd4 34.Bb5 Rd8 35.Qd3 Qf4
(279.488) 226.8
  8.01	 0:02 	+0.36--	31...c5 32.Nxd5 Nxd5 33.Bb5 Nxd4 34.Rxe7 Qxe7 35.Bxd4+
cxd4 (544.711) 236.4
  8.01	 0:03 	+0.29 	31...c5 32.Nxd5 Nxd5 33.Bb5 Nxd4 34.Rxe7 Rxe7 35.Qxc5 Nxb5
36.Bd4+ Kg8 37.Qxb5 (736.657) 241.1
  9.01	 0:06 	+0.04--	31...c5 32.Rxd5 Nxd5 33.dxc5 Qd8 34.Rd1 Kg8 35.Nxd5 Rc7
36.Nxc7 Qxc7 (1.689.322) 252.5
  9.01	 0:07 	-0.46--	31...c5 32.Rxd5 Nxd5 33.dxc5 Qd8 34.Rd1 Kg8 35.Nxd5 Nc7
36.Nxe7+ Kg7 37.Rxd8 (1.938.159) 256.3
  9.01	 0:09 	-1.52 	31...c5 32.Rxd5 Nxd5 33.dxc5 Qd8 34.Rd1 Rd7 35.Bb5 Nef4
36.Bg3 Ree7 37.Qb3 Nh5 38.Nxd5 Nxg3 (2.521.639) 257.9
  9.02	 0:10 	-1.51++	31...Nf4 32.Qd2 Nxh3+ 33.gxh3 Bxf3 34.Rxe7 Qxe7 35.h4
(2.688.863) 256.9
  9.02	 0:10 	-1.16++	31...Nf4 32.Qd2 Nxh3+ 33.gxh3 Bxf3 34.Rxe7 Rxe7 35.d5
(2.745.905) 256.7
  9.02	 0:14 	+0.01 	31...Nf4 32.Qd2 Nh5 33.Nxd5 Nxd5 34.Rce1 Nhf4 35.Rxe7 Rxe7
36.Bc4 Kg7 (3.712.586) 253.2
  9.04	 0:16 	+0.02++	31...h6 32.Qd2 Kh7 33.Rce1 a6 34.Nxd5 Nxd5 35.Kh1 Qd8
(4.213.439) 249.9
  9.04	 0:19 	+0.15 	31...h6 32.Kh1 a6 33.Bd3 Nf4 34.Nxd5 Ncxd5 35.Rxe7 Rxe7
36.Bh4 g5 (4.810.289) 248.6
 10.01	 0:32 	+0.05 	31...h6 32.Kh1 Kh7 33.Rce1 b6 34.Bh4 Rd7 35.Nxd5 Nxd5
36.Qd2 (7.968.004) 244.9
 11.01	 0:59 	-0.08 	31...h6 32.Kh1 Kg8 33.Qa4 a6 34.Bh4 g5 35.Bf2 (14.366.223)
241.9
 11.09	 1:41 	-0.07++	31...Bxf3 32.gxf3 Nxd4 33.Rxe7 Nxc2 34.Rxe8+ Nxe8 35.Rxc2
a6 36.Ne4 Qf4 37.Bc4 Qxf3 (24.558.569) 242.3
 11.09	 1:47 	+0.09 	31...Bxf3 32.gxf3 Nxd4 33.Rxe7 Nxc2 34.Rxe8+ Nxe8 35.Rxc2
b6 36.Kg2 g5 37.Be3 Qe7 38.Bd4+ (26.158.540) 243.2
 12.01	 2:22 	-0.01 	31...Bxf3 32.gxf3 Nxd4 33.Rxe7 Nxc2 34.Rxe8+ Nxe8 35.Rxc2
a5 36.Re2 Nf6 37.Bg2 Kg7 (35.253.501) 247.0
 13.01	 5:21 	-0.02 	31...Bxf3 32.gxf3 Nxd4 33.Rxe7 Nxc2 34.Rxe8+ Nxe8 35.Rxc2
b6 36.Kg2 Kg7 37.Bc4 Qxa3 (80.501.451) 250.3
 14.01	10:47 	-0.10 	31...Bxf3 32.gxf3 Nxd4 33.Rxe7 Nxc2 34.Rxe8+ Nxe8 35.Rxc2
b6 36.Kg2 Nf6 37.Bc4 Nh5 38.Ne2 c5 39.Be3 (167.491.119) 258.8
best move: Bd5xf3 time: 21:24.978 min  n/s: 252.647  CPU 98.8%  nodes:
324.643.725

How do other engines fair?

Cheers,
Jim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.