Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: significant math

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 13:59:29 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2002 at 16:53:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>Yep and I don't do it.  I've given you _real_ numbers.  Of course you can
>_always_
>run the test that Bruce and I did for yourself.  Crafty's source is available,
>so you have
>access to a bitmapper.  Yours isn't a bitmapper so you have access to one that
>is not.
>
>Compile both using the same compiler on a 32 bit machine and on a 64 bit machine
>and
>see if one speeds up _more_ than the other.  If so, you have to explain why that
>isn't
>attributed to the 64 bit architecture...

I thought this thread was about current performance rather than future
performance. I've posted my opinion about bitboard vs nonbitboard as
soons as 64-bit machines become common somewhere below this post.

--
GCP



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.