Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About compiler optimizations

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 15:08:13 12/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


I can post several examples, but I don't want to do Intel's QA work for them :-)

Thanks,
Eugene

On December 19, 2002 at 17:53:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On December 19, 2002 at 13:16:02, Frank Sgarra wrote:
>
>>On December 19, 2002 at 12:59:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On December 19, 2002 at 11:40:14, Frank Sgarra wrote:
>>>
>>>use intel c++ at own risk.
>>>
>>>never use it for code that is very critical for your company.
>>>never use it for a version of your chess program that joins
>>>a tournament.
>>>
>>>you'll give away a piece (or pawn in case of diep) because of
>>>bugs in a new intel c++ version. Let me assure you that.
>>>
>>>DIEP did.
>>
>>
>>
>>i would be happy to have a pice (my own) of code
>>that produces wrong(different) outputs compiled with intel C++,
>>because maybe it would give me a pointer to  a buggy place in
>>my own program.
>>
>>can you repeat the wrong output of diep when using that compiler?
>>
>>did you prove, that intel C++ is doing a bad job ?
>
>I have asked for such _many_ times.  He has _never_ supplied a piece of
>code that breaks Intel's compiler.  Just complaints that such code exists...



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.