Author: Jan Kiwitter
Date: 01:44:38 01/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2003 at 04:40:53, Jan Kiwitter wrote: >On January 02, 2003 at 00:47:04, Harald Faber wrote: > >>Which of these settings is the strongest one? Currently I do not know. I just >>have some hints. One of these hints is >> >>Fritz 8 - Chess Tiger 15 Gambit style: 13.5 - 6.5 (13.5-7.5) >> >>Games can be found on my website www.harald-faber.de >>Games played on 2 PCs, pb on, 40/120+60, both programs played with their own >>books. >> >>Who can give more hints so that we get a better idea? > >This result looks indeed very bad for the Gambit style. I am curious how your >other matches will end! >I don't own Fritz 8 myself, so i cannot compare the different Tiger styles with >Fritz 8. >I prefer to play against Tiger 15 Gambit agressive style, because the normal >Tiger plays to passiv sometimes. Here is an example where I tested, how active >the program would play: > >Date: 23/11/2002 >White: Jan Kiwitter >Black: Chess Tiger 15.0 engine - Normal style >Opening: A00 Clemenz Opening > >1. h3 e5 2. d3 d5 3. a3 Nc6 4. e3 Nf6 5. b3 Bd6 6. g3 O-O 7. Bb2 Re8 8. Bg2 a5 >9. Nd2 Bc5 10. Ne2 Bf5 11. Qc1 Qd6 12. Qd1 Qe7 13. Qc1 h6 14. Rb1 Bg6 15. Ra1 >Qd7 16. Rb1 d4 17. e4 Bh5 18. Qd1 Qe7 19. Ra1 Nd7 20. Ra2 f6 21. Ra1 Na7 22. Qc1 >Nc8 23. Qd1 Nd6 24. Ra2 Rf8 25. Ra1 Nb8 26. Ra2 Nc6 27. Ra1 Kh7 28. Ra2 Qe8 29. >Ra1 Qd7 30. Ra2 a4 31. b4 Bb6 32. Ra1 g5 33. Rb1 Kg7 34. Ba1 Ne7 35. Rc1 f5..... > >Finally f5… I admit I played nonsense moves but I was just curious how the >program would react. Why doesn’t it play f7-f5 or c7-c5-c4 earlier? And I have >other examples… >Using the Gambit style Tiger often find such plans much earlier... > >Regards >Jan P.S.: It was a game with 10 minutes for each player (Notebook 1.9 GHz, 512 MB RAM)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.