Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Junior is better even if it is slower than Deeper Blue !

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 15:06:00 01/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 27, 2003 at 17:37:20, Matthew Hull wrote:

>On January 27, 2003 at 17:30:26, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>On January 27, 2003 at 17:11:40, Matthew Hull wrote:
>>
>>>>The point is to stop the game, and not play against table bases, which is not
>>>>interesting.
>>>>Either Kasparov would draw the table bases or he would lose to the table bases,
>>>>either way it is not interesting as we already know he is not perfect and cannot
>>>>(maybe not) hold a draw in for instance a KRNKRR endgame.
>>>>
>>>>On the other hand it would also be wrong to claim that Junior won that endgame
>>>>simply because it read from a table base (table bases won, not Junior), so the
>>>>game is void at that moment.
>>>
>>>
>>>Not really.  Junior has to successfully steer the game to the won ending...just
>>>like humans do all the time!  There is no difference, correct?
>>
>>You are mixing things up now. If Junior can get to a won endgame then it won't
>>be declared draw, of course Junior wins.
>
>I was responding to "Junior won that endgame simply because it read from a table
>base", so I'm not mixed up. :)

Yes you are, but perhaps I wasn't clear.

What I meant was that if the rule wasn't there, we could have the senario that
the game goes into the table bases being _drawn_. If the rules wasn't there it
means "Junior" could keep playing just to see if Garry makes a mistake.
Should that happen it would mean Garry lost to the tables and not to Junior, IMO
(see other posts:).

Basicly the point is that this senario would tell us nothing about Kasparov and
nothing about Junior, thus I call it a void. Junior does not deserve the credit
for such a win, IMO.

>Junior sees the EGTB endgame in leaves of the search tree and plays the moves to
>get there.  It is Junior's win, not the EGTB, just like a GM steers the game
>toward a known won endgame.  Can you see it now?

This is not what the rule is about, don't you see that?
;)

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.