Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Junior is better even if it is slower than Deeper Blue !

Author: Matthew Hull

Date: 14:37:20 01/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 27, 2003 at 17:30:26, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On January 27, 2003 at 17:11:40, Matthew Hull wrote:
>
>>>The point is to stop the game, and not play against table bases, which is not
>>>interesting.
>>>Either Kasparov would draw the table bases or he would lose to the table bases,
>>>either way it is not interesting as we already know he is not perfect and cannot
>>>(maybe not) hold a draw in for instance a KRNKRR endgame.
>>>
>>>On the other hand it would also be wrong to claim that Junior won that endgame
>>>simply because it read from a table base (table bases won, not Junior), so the
>>>game is void at that moment.
>>
>>
>>Not really.  Junior has to successfully steer the game to the won ending...just
>>like humans do all the time!  There is no difference, correct?
>
>You are mixing things up now. If Junior can get to a won endgame then it won't
>be declared draw, of course Junior wins.

I was responding to "Junior won that endgame simply because it read from a table
base", so I'm not mixed up. :)

Junior sees the EGTB endgame in leaves of the search tree and plays the moves to
get there.  It is Junior's win, not the EGTB, just like a GM steers the game
toward a known won endgame.  Can you see it now?

Regards,
Matt



>
>>If the GM is ignorant where the EGTBs are not, then we want to see that.  No one
>>complained of unfairness when progs were weak at endgames (and many still are!).
>> There is no fairness problem here that I can see.  Pre-calculated tables are
>>part of chess programs.  It saves CPU cycles.
>>
>>:)
>>Matt
>
>Okay, we have a different opinion here, I think it is ridiculous to play against
>the tables, sort of like racing the speed of light, you can only lose.
>I don't care if Garry can play these random moves correctly, it says nothing
>about him as a chessplayer, only that he can't remember random data as well as a
>computer but we already know that.
>
>-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.