Author: John Merlino
Date: 11:18:35 01/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 21:27:40, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On January 28, 2003 at 20:55:25, John Merlino wrote:
>
>>On January 28, 2003 at 19:04:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>Commented game is ready for replay and download on section "Special" on our
>>>homepage Kurt & Rolf Chess at http://www.beepworld.de/members39/utzinger
>>>Kurt
>>
>>Great comments! Here are a couple of comments on YOUR comments:
>>
>>8...d6 -- Indeed this is a rare position. In the Chessmaster database, there are
>>only three games, and the only one of note is Shirov-Korneev, 1998, which
>>continued:
>>9.0-0 Nf6 10.Kh1 {!} h5 11.Bg5 Qc7 12.Qd7 Bd7 13.Rad1 Ne5 14.Be2 Bc6 15.f3 0-0-0
>>16.Nb5 {!} axb5 17.cxb5 Be8 18.Rc1 Bc5 19.Nd4 Kb8 20.b4 b6 21.a4 h4 22.a5 {!}
>>Nh5 {?} 23.Bxh4 g5 24.Qxg5 f6 25.Qe3 Qg7 {? -- CM9000 much prefers 25...Bxd4
>>26.Qxd4 Qa7} 26.g4 {bxc5 also wins} Nf4 27.bxc5 Nxe2 28.Nxe2 {Nxe6 is much
>>better and wins easily!} Rxh4 {?? -- loses instantly. bxc4 was probably the only
>>fighting chance} 29.c6 Rc8 30.Qxb6+ Ka8 31.c7 {THREE brutal connected passed
>>pawns just a few steps away from Black's open king! OUCH! White has a forced
>>mate in 11 after this move....} 1-0
>>
>>16.Qh5 -- Chessmaster 9000 has a difficult time deciding on which move to play
>>here. It does consider Qh5 for some time, but also might play c5!? depending on
>>hardware and time control.
>
>Ruffian likes neither Qh5 nor c5:
>
>E:\programme\winboard\ruffian>ruffian -h 300M -T c:\tmp\qh5.epd -t 999 -p 999
>Hash size 314572800
>Ruffian 1.0.1
>feature done=0
>Loading configuration: ruffian.cfg
>Warning: EGTB_HASH_SIZE changed, default=1048576, newvalue=8388608
>Logfile: Tue Jan 28 18:08:47 2003
>Total hash size 300M
>Initializing tablebases: /programme/winboard/nalimov
>Testing c:\tmp\qh5.epd, 999 seconds, extra ply 999
>Testing: test 1 Solution: Qh5
> 2bq1rk1/rp2nppp/3p4/3Np3/p1PnP3/3B4/PP1N1PPP/2RQR1K1 w - -
> Depth Time Score Best line
> 6--> 1.16 0.25 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 a3 b3 Nxd5 cxd5
> 7/17 1.32 0.21 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Nxe2+ Qxe2 a3 b3 Nxd5 cxd5 b6
> 7--> 1.98 0.21 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Nxe2+ Qxe2 a3 b3 Nxd5 cxd5 b6
> 8/19 2.34 0.17 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nxd5 cxd5 Qb6 Qd2 Nxf3+ gxf3
> 8--> 4.96 0.17 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nxd5 cxd5 Qb6 Qd2 Nxf3+ gxf3
> 9/22 5.90 -0.03 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Nxe7+ Qxe7 Bxf3 a3 b3 Rc8 Bg4
> 9/22 6.01 x.xx Rc3
> 9/22 8.00 0.13 Rc3 Nxd5 exd5 b6 Qh5 g6 Qh6 Bg4 f3 Bd7
> 9--> 15.80 0.13 Rc3 Nxd5 exd5 b6 Qh5 g6 Qh6 Bg4 f3 Bd7
> 10/22 18.57 0.12 Rc3 Nxd5 exd5 g6 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Nxe2+ Qxe2 Qc7 Qe4 Bd7
> 10/23 24.97 x.xx Be2
> 10/23 25.18 0.13 Be2 a3 b3 Nxd5 cxd5 b6 Nf3 Nxf3+ Bxf3 Rc7 Rxc7 Qxc7
> Qd2
> 10/23 36.83 x.xx Re3
> 10/23 42.40 0.14 Re3 Ra8 Bf1 Bd7 c5 Nxd5 exd5 Qc7 cxd6 Qxd6 Bc4
> 10--> 52.88 0.14 Re3 Ra8 Bf1 Bd7 c5 Nxd5 exd5 Qc7 cxd6 Qxd6 Bc4
> 11/25 1:28 0.14 Re3 a3 b4 Be6 Nf3 Nxf3+ Qxf3 Nc6 Be2 b6 b5 Nd4 Qh5
> 11/28 2:08 x.xx Be2
> 11/28 2:25 0.15 Be2 Nxd5 cxd5 Qb6 Bh5 Bd7 Nc4 Qa6 Bg4 b5 Bxd7 Rxd7
> Nd2
> 11--> 2:52 0.15 Be2 Nxd5 cxd5 Qb6 Bh5 Bd7 Nc4 Qa6 Bg4 b5 Bxd7 Rxd7
> Nd2
> 12/28 3:51 0.15 Be2 Nxd5 cxd5 Qb6 Bh5 Bd7 Nc4 Qa6 Bg4 b5 Bxd7 Rxd7
> Nd2
> 12--> 5:41 0.15 Be2 Nxd5 cxd5 Qb6 Bh5 Bd7 Nc4 Qa6 Bg4 b5 Bxd7 Rxd7
> Nd2
> 13/30 8:05 0.12 Be2 Nxd5 cxd5 a3 b4 f5 Bh5 g6 Be2 Rf7 Nf3 Rc7 Rxc7
> Nxe2+ Qxe2 Qxc7
> 13/31 11:18 x.xx Rc3
> 13--> 16:09 0.12 Be2 Nxd5 cxd5 a3 b4 f5 Bh5 g6 Be2 Rf7 Nf3 Rc7 Rxc7
> Nxe2+ Qxe2 Qxc7
> 14... 16:09 1/42 Be2
>
>Time: 16:39, cpu 66.20%, nodes 324468931, nps 324774
>Hash: 128M, used 99%, hits 22%
>EGTB: probs 0, hits 0
>
>Best move: Be2 (0.12) Not solved (0/1)
>
>Summery: 0/1
Fascinating. Obviously a very critical move! I think I'll ask my human friends
(IM Waitzkin and GM Evans) what they think of the position. It would be nice to
chat with them anyway....
jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.