Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 00:20:20 02/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2003 at 00:00:47, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On January 31, 2003 at 22:54:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 31, 2003 at 21:18:04, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>On January 31, 2003 at 20:09:51, Matt Taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On January 31, 2003 at 16:55:51, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 31, 2003 at 15:30:02, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 31, 2003 at 14:19:22, Vladik wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>I bought AMD Athlon XP2400+ and on my pc shows 2.0 GHz is that right ? >>>>>>>And do i need any configration in Bios or to leave it defoult settings ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>my hardware: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>AMD Athlon XP2400+ >>>>>>>Asus A7S333 >>>>>>>Samsung(333 mhz) 256 DDR >>>>>>>Win XP Prof. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I tested Fritzmrk under Fritz 7 Gui with Fritz 7.0.0.8 with 32 mb hash and the >>>>>>>kn/s is: 1100 kn/s per second. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I wonder that is everything okay or there is something wrong ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks in advance >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>>Vladik >>>>>> >>>>>>Dual Xeon 2.0Ghz can get 4200 fritzmark . About 4000 Kn/s >>>>> >>>>>Something is wrong here, by what you say you should get over 2000 Kn/s on a >>>>>single 2 Ghz Xeon?? that can't be right. >>>>> >>>>>(I assume you used DF7 for your fritzmark?) >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Jonas >>>> >>>>Somebody else posted that a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 scored 950 Kn/s. Therefore a dual >>>>2.4 GHz Xeon would score somewhere below 1900 Kn/s. The only explanation for an >>>>aberration is that other assumptions were violated. This may be effects from a >>>>larger cache, or it could be a different type of ram, different hash table size, >>>>or any number of things. >>>> >>>>It would be useful if those sorts of variables were posted alongside the >>>>benchmark data. Otherwise the only conclusion that can be drawn is that all 3 >>>>systems are fast. >>>> >>>>-Matt >>> >>>No matter what RAM or cache it has a dual 2.0 Ghz xeon could not outperform a >>>dual 2.4 Ghz with more than a 100%, atleast not the way i see it, Hyatt, Slater >>>can you enlighten me? >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >> >>I can't help much. I have a dual 2.8 xeon that runs the crafty benchmark at >>2.1M nodes per second under linux. I have no idea how fast fritz would run >>on this box however... > >Deep Fritz 7 mark on my Dual AMD 1600+ is around 1400 Kn/s >Crafty 19.02 does 1.284.735 nodes > >That would translate into this (roughly): > >On your machine according to my benchmarks, Deep Fritz 7 would do around 2500 >Kn/s and you run with 2 x 2.8 Ghz, his friend only have a 2 x 2.0 Ghz... > >The point is that Lei is claiming that Deep Fritz mark on his friends dual 2.0 >Ghz Xeon is a little under 4000 Kn/s i find it hard to believe that a single >Xeon 2.0 Ghz would outperform My Dual AMD... > >Regards >Jonas Just look carefull at the picture....IMHO Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.