Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 09:12:05 02/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2003 at 06:42:46, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 22, 2003 at 05:52:09, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>On February 21, 2003 at 15:47:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>Tony, >>> >>>I want to say to you the same as to Jonas. To me it makes no sense to talk to >>>you because you don't like open debates. Your interest is to defed SSDF also in >>>its faults. But that then develops into a mean debate with tricks an personal >>>attacks. >> >>Not by me. >> >>>It simply makes no sense. I am interested in the best theoretical views >>>while you want to justify SSDF by all means. This becomes boring. Because you >>>defend false methods. But I don't care. Do what you want. I debate with people >>>of similar scientifical interest. >> >>Then why don't you answer Maurizio De Leo's questions, and debate with him? >>Or is it so that "people of similar scientifical interest" is people with the >>same idea as you, as Richard Pijl seem to have. Whom you willingly debate with. > >That is a good example for what I called personal attacks. You don't know what >you are talking here. Scientifical interests is identical with objective >questioning and analysing. Period. I see you have stopped debating with Richard Pijl. Is he not objective anymore? :) Tony >Rolf Tueschen > > > >> >>Tony >> >>>If you should have questions or something new >>>then I will return. But this here is simply too time consuming. >>> >>>Don't take this as a personal attack. >>> >>>Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.