Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:57:17 02/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2003 at 18:44:30, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 24, 2003 at 18:21:53, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 24, 2003 at 18:00:25, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I see that I did not include it in the right order and now I have no problem. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Almost >> >>The only small problem is that I get slightly slower times(less than 1% >>difference but I do not like it) >> >>344.90 seconds against 346.86 seconds and also the time in the middle has the >>same pattern. >> >>I think that the exe is simply slightly slower than the previous exe because I >>usually get more similiar results with the same code. > >C++ offers no real performance boost. > >For either C or C++ with the MS VC++ compiler, simply select the option that >says "Inline any suitable function" and you will get the same sort of inline >benefit. > >Unless you check not to allow structured exception handling, you should see a >small *decrease* in performance. > >The only real reason to use C++ instead of C is for the better abstraction level >that is possible. > >Also, you will get approximately the same warnings for either C or C++ if you >increase your warning level to the highest one. The only reason that I decided to try C++ is inlining functions I see that I do not need it because it seems to me based on looking at the help that __inline in C is the same as __inline in C++ and I see no difference between __inline and inline in C++. I do not know how to select the option inline every suitable function and I now only optimize for speed(I use VC++6). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.