Author: Chris Carson
Date: 04:27:07 03/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2003 at 19:53:10, Jason Waugh wrote: >I'll contribute what I can, for what it's worth: > >Using the test position posted.... > >Chess Tiger 15 (Palm Tungsten T, 1.5MB HT) - 390 NPS >Chess Tiger 15 (Pentium II 400MHz w/Win2K, 384MB RAM, 96MB HT} - 82,000 NPS > > >On the Tungsten T, CT15 runs under PACE and runs at the same speed as it does on >a 33MHz palm device. This isn't just "the word on the street" - I can vouch for >this, as TigerMark (CT's built in benchmark) displayed the same score on my m505 >as it does on my Tungsten. I cannot test overclocking since I no longer have my >m505. When we can see how well it runs with some ARM code depends on >Christophe. ;) > >Since similar engines are not available for Pocket PC and Palm, then the >comparison can't exactly be scientific - but if it helps, I tested that position >on my PC with Ruffian (96MB HT) and achieved 185,500 NPS > >(hmmn, interestingly enough, despite the fact that Ruffian was more than "twice >as fast" - CT15 was well into 14 ply depth before the minute was up, Ruffian >only in the middle of 12. Mind you, that doesn't necessarily mean anything >either.) > > >Jason. Thanks Jason. I am interested in how the programs scale from handheld to pc and from handheld to handheld. Nothing like Specint is out there for handhelds, so this is interesting. Comparing NPS from CT and Ruffian is mostly meaningless, however, CT or Russian on different devices (handheld, PC) is interesting. CT is the strongest handheld for sure and SSDF has done some testing, so the NPS comparison is even more interesting. Thanks again, I will consolidate and post the consolidation later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.