Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: There are no Muslim democracies

Author: David Dory

Date: 22:58:16 04/02/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 02, 2003 at 11:38:29, Aaron Tay wrote:

>On April 02, 2003 at 07:01:56, David Dory wrote:
>
>>On April 02, 2003 at 05:50:04, Aaron Tay wrote:
>>
>>>On April 02, 2003 at 00:17:29, David Dory wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 01, 2003 at 20:29:19, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 01, 2003 at 19:55:32, David Dory wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>An obvious conflict of freedoms: not one Muslim country is a democracy. Not one.
>>>>>
>>>>>Turkey, Indonesia, and Pakistan.  That's all I can think of now, but it would
>>>>>not surprise me if there were more.
>>>>>
>>>>>But this kind of stuff is more appropriate for CTF, I think.
>>>>>
>>>>>bruce
>>>>
>>>>This exact question was asked this week to the government spokesman from Saudi
>>>>Arabia.
>>>>
>>>>The spokesman agreed, there was NOT ONE Muslim country that was a democracy.
>>>>Not a single one.
>>>>
>>>>Turkey is a secular country, IIRC, and Pakistan is a military dictatorship (he's
>>>>**promised** to have elections, though :) ).
>>>>
>>>>You may think of Indonesia (which has a huge Muslim population), as the
>>>>exception, but I defer to the Muslim spokesman from Saudi Arabia. He made it
>>>>very clear.
>>>
>>>I submit respectfully the "muslim spokesman" is wrong.
>>>
>>>Malaysia is a democracy for one. So is Indonesia.
>>>
>>>Aaron
>>
>>These are both secular countries with lots of muslim citizens. They are not
>>muslim countries, only following muslim law(s).
>
>It's seem to me then that your reasoning is circular. By your definition muslim
>countries must be non-democratic. Any "muslim countries" with secular countries
>are not "muslim countries".
>
>
>BTW Malaysia does not follow muslim law (non-muslims have freedom to worship and
>"muslim law" does not apply to them) altough in theory UMNO (the ruling party)
>could lose the elections to PAS and they could make it so that muslim laws
>applied to all. Would they be democractic then?
>
>Aaron

If they had representative elections of their government officials, who in turn
made their laws, yes. That would be a muslim democracy. IIUC.

BTW this is not MY reasoning. The reasoning belongs to the foreign minister of
Saudi Arabia. Clearly, as a muslim, a Saudi Prince, and a politician, he knows a
LOT more about this topic than you or I, I'd wager.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.